William Hazlitt, a prominent essayist and critic of the Romantic era, articulates his profound appreciation for reading old books in his essay titled “On Reading Old Books.” He contrasts the familiar comfort of revisiting established literary works with the uncertainty and potential disappointment of exploring new ones. Hazlitt finds solace and reassurance in the predictability of old plots and the company of familiar authors, likening them to cherished friends whose companionship he can rely on. He celebrates the enduring quality of these works, which provide a stable anchor amidst the flux of time and taste.

Hazlitt’s preference for older literature is rooted in its ability to evoke memories of his youth and more vibrant times. He reminisces about encountering works like Smollett’s “Peregrine Pickle,” Fielding’s “Tom Jones,” and Cervantes’s “Don Quixote” during his formative years, when their narratives had a profound impact on him. These books, he suggests, have stood the test of time not just in their narrative appeal but also in their ability to serve as markers of personal growth and identity.

However, Hazlitt is not blindly nostalgic. He acknowledges that not all old books retain their charm upon re-reading, citing Rousseau’s “The New Eloise” as an example that failed to impress him as much in later years. Despite this, he values the consistency and reliability of established literary classics, which offer a level of assurance and depth of insight that he finds lacking in much contemporary literature.

Hazlitt’s critique extends beyond mere personal preference; he critiques contemporary writers and works with a discerning eye, drawing comparisons and making judgments based on literary merit and lasting impact. His essays, known for their passionate and sometimes pugnacious prose style, reflect a deep engagement with both the aesthetic and moral dimensions of literature.

In essence, Hazlitt’s essay on reading old books not only underscores his personal pleasure in revisiting literary classics but also reveals his broader philosophy on literature and its role in shaping individual consciousness and cultural continuity. His insights continue to resonate today, offering a compelling perspective on the enduring value of literary heritage amidst the flux of changing tastes and times.