EDMUND:
“Thou, Nature, art my goddess. To thy law / My services are bound.”
- Explanation: Edmund declares allegiance not to man-made laws or social customs but to Nature.
- Analysis: This sets him apart from society’s norms. He’s aligning with natural instinct and survival over morality.
- Language devices: Apostrophe (addressing Nature), personification (Nature as a goddess).
- Themes: Natural vs. legal order, individualism, subversion of social norms.
“Wherefore should I / Stand in the plague of custom, and permit / The curiosity of nations to deprive me”
- Explanation: He questions why he should obey social customs that deny him rights.
- Analysis: “Plague of custom” implies that tradition is harmful. “Curiosity” here means interference or artificiality of societal laws.
- Language devices: Metaphor (“plague of custom”).
- Themes: Legitimacy, rejection of societal constraints.
“For that I am some twelve or fourteen moonshines / Lag of a brother?”
- Explanation: He resents that he is treated differently just because he was born a year or so after his brother, and out of wedlock.
- Analysis: Time of birth and marital status determine inheritance — an arbitrary, unfair rule in Edmund’s eyes.
- Themes: Injustice of primogeniture, identity, resentment.
“why ‘bastard’? Wherefore ‘base’,”
- Explanation: He is bitter about the derogatory terms society uses for people like him.
- Analysis: Repetition highlights his deep frustration and the stigma attached to his birth.
- Language devices: Rhetorical questions, anaphora (“why… why”).
- Themes: Stigma and identity, language and labeling.
“When my dimensions are as well compact, / My mind as generous and my shape as true / As honest madam’s issue?”
- Explanation: He argues he is just as physically and mentally capable as a legitimate son.
- Analysis: He sees no natural difference between himself and Edgar — only a social construct.
- Language devices: Parallel structure, irony (society sees him as inferior despite equality).
- Themes: Merit vs. birthright, appearance vs. reality.
“Why brand they us / With ‘base’, with ‘baseness’, ‘bastardy’, ‘base’, / ‘base’,”
- Explanation: He repeats the insulting terms to show how often and unfairly they’re used.
- Analysis: The repetition builds emotional intensity and shows how these labels haunt him.
- Language devices: Repetition, diacope (repeated word with words in between).
- Themes: Power of language, social labeling, bitterness and ambition.
“Who, in the lusty stealth of nature, take / More composition and fierce quality / Than doth within a dull, stale, tired bed / Go to th’ creating a whole tribe of fops / Got ’tween asleep and wake?”
- Explanation: He argues that children born from passionate, natural unions (like himself) have more strength and spirit than those born in dull, formal marriages.
- Analysis: He’s turning the supposed disgrace of illegitimacy into a badge of superiority.
- Language devices: Irony, vivid imagery, metaphor (“lusty stealth of nature”, “tribe of fops”).
- Themes: Reversing moral judgments, power of passion, natural vitality vs. social decay.
“Well then, / Legitimate Edgar, I must have your land.”
- Explanation: He reveals his intention to steal Edgar’s inheritance.
- Analysis: This is the turning point where thought turns to action.
- Themes: Betrayal, ambition, inheritance.
“Our father’s love is to the bastard Edmund / As to th’ legitimate.”
- Explanation: He notes that Gloucester treats him with as much love as he does Edgar.
- Analysis: This might justify, in Edmund’s mind, his challenge for power.
- Themes: Favoritism, father-son dynamics, legitimacy.
“Fine word, ‘legitimate’.”
- Explanation: He mocks the word “legitimate.”
- Analysis: He treats it as an empty term, not backed by actual merit.
- Language devices: Sarcasm, metaphor.
- Themes: Language manipulation, power of words.
“Well, my legitimate, if this letter speed / And my invention thrive,”
- Explanation: If his plan and forged letter succeed…
- Analysis: He’s already plotting and confident in his deceit.
- Themes: Deception, cunning vs. innocence.
“Edmund the base / Shall top th’ legitimate.”
- Explanation: He will surpass his brother.
- Analysis: The pun on “top” suggests both success and dominance.
- Themes: Ambition, rise of the outsider.
“I grow, I prosper.”
- Explanation: He celebrates his upward mobility.
- Language devices: Asyndeton, repetition, triumphant tone.
- Themes: Self-empowerment, progress, individual will.
“Now, gods, stand up for bastards!”
- Explanation: He calls on the gods to support illegitimate children.
- Analysis: A bold challenge to divine and societal order. He turns his social status into a war cry.
- Language devices: Exclamation, apostrophe, irony.
- Themes: Defiance of fate, injustice of social norms, divine justice vs. personal will.
GLOUCESTER:
“Kent banished thus? And France in choler parted? / And the King gone tonight, prescribed his power, / Confined to exhibition?”
- Explanation: Gloucester is reacting to the chaotic political developments, questioning the exile of Kent, the anger between France and England, and the King’s power being limited.
- Analysis: He is shocked by the state of affairs, highlighting political instability. The word “exhibition” here refers to a formal presentation, suggesting that King Lear’s authority is being restricted.
- Language devices: Rhetorical questions (to express confusion and disbelief).
- Themes: Political turmoil, corruption of power, disruption of natural order.
“All this done / Upon the gad?—Edmund, how now? What news?”
- Explanation: Gloucester is bewildered and asks Edmund for news. “Upon the gad” refers to doing something impulsively or unexpectedly.
- Analysis: Gloucester is trying to make sense of the upheaval, but his inquiry to Edmund suggests that Edmund may have some information to offer.
- Language devices: Colloquialism (“upon the gad” – informal expression).
- Themes: Chaos, mystery and deception, truth vs. lies.
EDMUND:
“So please your Lordship, none. He puts a paper in his pocket.”
- Explanation: Edmund feigns ignorance, claiming that he knows no news, while secretly hiding a paper.
- Analysis: Edmund is being deceptive and trying to conceal something from Gloucester.
- Language devices: Dramatic irony (the audience knows Edmund is lying, but Gloucester does not).
- Themes: Deception, betrayal, hidden motives.
GLOUCESTER:
“Why so earnestly seek you to put up that letter?”
- Explanation: Gloucester is suspicious of Edmund’s actions, particularly why he is so eager to hide the letter.
- Analysis: Gloucester’s suspicion indicates his growing distrust, though he still doesn’t realize Edmund’s full treachery.
- Language devices: Rhetorical question (to challenge Edmund’s actions).
- Themes: Suspicion, uncovering truths, misplaced trust.
EDMUND:
“I know no news, my lord.”
- Explanation: Edmund continues his lie, denying any knowledge of the contents of the letter.
- Analysis: This further illustrates Edmund’s duplicity and his skill at concealing his intentions.
- Language devices: Dramatic irony (audience knows Edmund is lying).
- Themes: Deception, manipulation, self-interest.
GLOUCESTER:
“What paper were you reading?”
- Explanation: Gloucester presses further, demanding to know the contents of the paper Edmund is hiding.
- Analysis: Gloucester is becoming more curious and suspicious.
- Language devices: Direct question (to challenge Edmund).
- Themes: Curiosity, suspicion, discovery.
EDMUND:
“Nothing, my lord.”
- Explanation: Edmund lies again, claiming there is nothing in the paper.
- Analysis: This demonstrates his willingness to persist in deceiving Gloucester.
- Language devices: Dramatic irony (audience knows the paper contains something significant).
- Themes: Deception, hidden truths, manipulation.
GLOUCESTER:
“No? What needed then that terrible dispatch / of it into your pocket? The quality of nothing / hath not such need to hide itself.”
- Explanation: Gloucester challenges Edmund’s claim, pointing out that if the paper is truly “nothing,” then there would be no need to hide it so urgently.
- Analysis: Gloucester is becoming more skeptical of Edmund, beginning to question his behavior.
- Language devices: Rhetorical question, irony (the paper is clearly important, but Edmund denies it).
- Themes: Suspicion, truth vs. lies, revelation.
“Let’s see. Come, if it be nothing, I shall not need spectacles.”
- Explanation: Gloucester insists on seeing the paper, sarcastically suggesting that if it is truly nothing, he won’t need spectacles to read it.
- Analysis: Gloucester is now fully skeptical and is calling Edmund’s bluff.
- Language devices: Sarcasm, rhetorical question.
- Themes: Truth vs. deception, uncovering hidden motives, skepticism.
EDMUND:
“I beseech you, sir, pardon me. It is a letter / from my brother that I have not all o’erread; and / for so much as I have perused, I find it not fit for / your o’erlooking.”
- Explanation: Edmund lies again, claiming the letter is from his brother, Edgar, and that he hasn’t fully read it, but it contains things unfit for Gloucester to see.
- Analysis: Edmund continues to manipulate Gloucester with fabricated explanations.
- Language devices: Evasion, lies.
- Themes: Deception, family dynamics, manipulation.
GLOUCESTER:
“Give me the letter, sir.”
- Explanation: Gloucester insists on reading the letter, now determined to uncover the truth.
- Analysis: Gloucester is becoming more forceful and suspicious.
- Themes: Suspicion, revealing the truth.
EDMUND:
“I shall offend either to detain or give it. The / contents, as in part I understand them, are to / blame.”
- Explanation: Edmund pretends to be reluctant, claiming that giving the letter may cause offense, but suggests it is damaging to Edgar’s reputation.
- Analysis: Edmund is trying to set up his brother, Edgar, by framing the letter as something incriminating.
- Language devices: Evasion, deception.
- Themes: Betrayal, family conflict, deceit.
GLOUCESTER:
“Let’s see, let’s see.”
- Explanation: Gloucester insists once again, more determined to see the letter.
- Analysis: Gloucester is now fully convinced that the letter is important and wants to uncover its contents.
- Themes: Revelation, truth-seeking, unmasking deceit.
EDMUND (aside):
“I hope, for my brother’s justification, he / wrote this but as an essay or taste of my virtue.”
- Explanation: Edmund claims, in an aside, that perhaps Edgar wrote the letter as a test of Edmund’s virtue, attempting to distance himself from the letter’s contents.
- Analysis: Edmund’s sly manipulation continues, as he tries to cover his tracks and avoid blame.
- Language devices: Aside, irony (audience knows the letter is a tool for Edmund’s scheme).
- Themes: Deception, family dynamics, self-preservation.
GLOUCESTER (reads):
“This policy and reverence of age / makes the world bitter to the best of our times…”
- Explanation: Gloucester begins to read the letter aloud, which criticizes the elder generation’s hold on power, particularly through “aged tyranny.”
- Analysis: This highlights Edgar’s frustration with the elderly (his father, Gloucester), setting the stage for Edmund to further manipulate Gloucester.
- Language devices: Allegory (critique of the elderly and their hold on power), metaphor (tyranny of age).
- Themes: Generational conflict, social commentary on age and power.
“I begin to find an idle and fond bondage in the / oppression of aged tyranny, who sways not as it hath / power but as it is suffered.”
- Explanation: Gloucester reads about Edgar’s belief that the old are oppressive because they are allowed to be, not because they deserve power.
- Analysis: This reveals Edgar’s dissatisfaction with Gloucester’s authority and the old generation’s control.
- Language devices: Metaphor, personification (aged tyranny).
- Themes: Rebellion, generational conflict, power dynamics.
“Come to me, that of this I may speak more. / If our father would sleep till I waked him, you should / enjoy half his revenue forever and live the beloved / of your brother. Edgar.”
- Explanation: The letter suggests that if Gloucester were to die (sleep), Edmund would inherit his wealth and be beloved by Edgar.
- Analysis: This is clearly treasonous content that would undermine Edgar and justify Edmund’s desire for his inheritance.
- Themes: Betrayal, power struggle, family conflict.
GLOUCESTER (reads):
“Hum? Conspiracy? ‘Sleep till I wake him, you / should enjoy half his revenue.’”
- Explanation: Gloucester questions whether Edgar is involved in a conspiracy against him.
- Analysis: Gloucester is beginning to doubt his son, Edgar, but still doesn’t see the full picture.
- Language devices: Rhetorical question (to express suspicion).
- Themes: Conspiracy, suspicion, deception.
“My son Edgar! Had he a hand to write this? A heart and brain to breed it in?”
- Explanation: Gloucester is in disbelief, wondering if Edgar could really be capable of such treachery.
- Analysis: Gloucester is in shock, still not fully understanding that Edmund is behind this.
- Language devices: Rhetorical question, shock.
- Themes: Shock and disbelief, family betrayal, blindness to truth.
“When came you to this? Who brought it?”
- Explanation: Gloucester presses Edmund for more details about when and how he received the letter.
- Analysis: Gloucester’s suspicion grows, but Edmund is ready to deceive him further.
- Themes: Truth-seeking, suspicion, manipulation.
EDMUND: “It was not brought me, my lord; there’s the cunning of it. I found it thrown in at the casement of my closet.”
In this line, Edmund explains the mysterious way in which the letter arrived. He tries to distance himself from the letter’s origin by claiming it was thrown in through his window, thus hinting at its suspicious nature. He presents this as part of the cunning plan, subtly drawing attention to how it could be seen as a clever trick.
Language Devices:
- Dramatic irony: The audience knows Edmund’s deceitful nature, while Gloucester remains unaware of his manipulations.
- Metaphor: Edmund refers to the “cunning” of the letter’s arrival, emphasizing its mysterious and clever nature.
GLOUCESTER: “You know the character to be your brother’s?”
Gloucester questions Edmund if he recognizes his brother Edgar’s handwriting, seeking confirmation about the letter’s authenticity.
EDMUND: “If the matter were good, my lord, I durst swear it were his; but in respect of that, I would fain think it were not.”
Edmund pretends to doubt the authenticity of the letter, expressing hesitation only because of its troubling contents. This false reluctance is meant to make him seem more trustworthy and cautious.
Language Devices:
- Irony: Edmund downplays his own role, feigning doubt to mislead Gloucester.
- Understatement: Edmund subtly minimizes his suspicions, trying to appear less involved than he is.
GLOUCESTER: “It is his.”
Gloucester is convinced that the letter is Edgar’s, trusting in his son’s handwriting and character.
EDMUND: “It is his hand, my lord, but I hope his heart is not in the contents.”
Edmund admits that the handwriting matches Edgar’s but suggests that the letter’s contents don’t represent Edgar’s true feelings. This statement deepens Gloucester’s confusion and suspicion.
GLOUCESTER: “Has he never before sounded you in this business?”
Gloucester asks Edmund if Edgar has ever spoken to him about such matters before, hoping to gather more insight into the situation.
EDMUND: “Never, my lord. But I have heard him oft maintain it to be fit that, sons at perfect age and fathers declined, the father should be as ward to the son, and the son manage his revenue.”
Edmund claims that Edgar has never expressed such ideas to him. Instead, he suggests that Edgar has often spoken of a time when sons, having reached adulthood, should manage their fathers’ estates. This subtly echoes the letter’s contents, implying that Edgar is already thinking along these lines.
Language Devices:
- Foreshadowing: Edmund’s words hint at the future conflict over power, inheritance, and control.
GLOUCESTER: “O villain, villain! His very opinion in the letter. Abhorred villain! Unnatural, detested, brutish villain! Worse than brutish!”
Gloucester reacts with extreme anger and disgust, immediately accusing his son Edgar of treasonous behavior. He believes the letter to be a reflection of Edgar’s true feelings, amplifying his emotional response.
Language Devices:
- Repetition: The repeated use of “villain” emphasizes Gloucester’s shock and deep sense of betrayal.
- Alliteration: Phrases like “unnatural, detested, brutish villain” use alliteration to intensify the anger and revulsion Gloucester feels.
GLOUCESTER: “Go, sirrah, seek him. I’ll apprehend him. Abominable villain!—Where is he?”
Gloucester orders Edmund to find Edgar so he can confront him immediately. His words are filled with a sense of urgency, driven by his desire to punish his son for the alleged betrayal.
Language Devices:
- Exclamation: The use of exclamations like “Abominable villain!” shows the depth of Gloucester’s emotional response.
- Imperative tone: Gloucester’s commands reflect his authoritative position and his desire to take swift action.
EDMUND: “I do not well know, my lord. If it shall please you to suspend your indignation against my brother till you can derive from him better testimony of his intent, you should run a certain course; where, if you violently proceed against him, mistaking his purpose, it would make a great gap in your own honor and shake in pieces the heart of his obedience.”
Edmund advises Gloucester to wait before acting in anger, suggesting that rushing to judgment could damage his reputation and harm Edgar’s loyalty. He cleverly presents himself as a voice of reason and caution, positioning himself as a trustworthy advisor.
Language Devices:
- Rhetorical appeal: Edmund uses ethos and logos to manipulate Gloucester, appealing to his sense of honor and logic to delay action.
- Metaphor: “A great gap in your honor” symbolizes how hastily condemning Edgar would damage Gloucester’s reputation.
GLOUCESTER:
“Think you so?”
- Explanation: Gloucester, still grappling with the idea of his son Edgar’s potential betrayal, asks Edmund for confirmation. He’s seeking reassurance, which shows that he is already being manipulated.
- Language Devices: Rhetorical Question – Gloucester uses this to question Edmund, indicating doubt and seeking clarity.
EDMUND:
“If your Honor judge it meet, I will place you where you shall hear us confer of this, and by an auricular assurance have your satisfaction, and that without any further delay than this very evening.”
- Explanation: Edmund continues to manipulate Gloucester by offering to let him listen in on a conversation with Edgar. He promises quick resolution, making it sound like an urgent but well-thought-out plan. This is an attempt to solidify his position as a loyal son.
- Language Devices:
- Formal language: Words like “auricular assurance” and “honor” are used to elevate Edmund’s tone, making his offer appear highly respectful and trustworthy.
- Euphemism: “Auricular assurance” means hearing something for confirmation, masking the reality of the manipulation.
GLOUCESTER:
“He cannot be such a monster.”
- Explanation: Gloucester expresses disbelief. He cannot fathom that his son Edgar could act in such a cruel manner. This shows his strong affection for Edgar and his inability to see the situation clearly.
- Language Devices:
- Metaphor: Calling Edgar a “monster” is metaphorical; Gloucester is shocked by the idea of his son’s betrayal and likens it to something unnatural or monstrous.
EDMUND:
“Nor is not, sure.”
- Explanation: Edmund pretends to agree with Gloucester, affirming that Edgar is not a monster. However, his statement is ironic since Edmund himself is behind the betrayal. Edmund is pretending to be supportive, keeping up the facade of innocence.
- Language Devices:
- Double Negative: “Nor is not” emphasizes Edmund’s feigned reassurance and adds a layer of deception.
GLOUCESTER:
“To his father, that so tenderly and entirely loves him! Heaven and Earth!”
- Explanation: Gloucester is emotionally overwhelmed, lamenting that his son, whom he loves dearly, could betray him. His shock is underscored by the exclamation.
- Language Devices:
- Exclamation: The phrase “Heaven and Earth!” expresses Gloucester’s astonishment and dismay at the idea of his son betraying him.
- Hyperbole: The exclamation exaggerates Gloucester’s emotional reaction, emphasizing his disbelief and pain.
GLOUCESTER:
“Edmund, seek him out; wind me into him, I pray you. Frame the business after your own wisdom. I would unstate myself to be in a due resolution.”
- Explanation: Gloucester urges Edmund to find Edgar and resolve the issue. His trust in Edmund is clear here; he even gives Edmund full control of the situation. The phrase “I would unstate myself” suggests that Gloucester is willing to abandon his own judgment to follow Edmund’s course of action.
- Language Devices:
- Metaphor: “Wind me into him” could suggest that Edmund is being asked to manipulate or persuade Gloucester to trust him, as though he could untangle the situation.
- Irony: Gloucester willingly gives up his own decision-making power, which is ironic because he is placing his trust in the very person (Edmund) who is deceiving him.
EDMUND:
“I will seek him, sir, presently, convey the business as I shall find means, and acquaint you withal.”
- Explanation: Edmund agrees to carry out the plan, reaffirming his role as the dutiful son, while continuing his deception. He assures Gloucester that he will find Edgar and resolve the matter.
- Language Devices:
- Politeness/formal language: “Sir” adds an air of respect in Edmund’s words, which helps in keeping up the act of loyalty and sincerity.
- Vagueness: “As I shall find means” is a vague phrase, leaving open-ended possibilities for Edmund’s true intentions.
GLOUCESTER:
“These late eclipses in the sun and moon portend no good to us.”
- Explanation: Gloucester interprets the recent eclipses in the sky as omens of bad fortune. He believes the celestial events signify the disorder in the world, including the familial and political chaos he is experiencing.
- Language Devices:
- Symbolism: The “eclipses” symbolize the dark and ominous events unfolding in Gloucester’s life, particularly the betrayal he feels.
- Foreshadowing: The reference to bad omens points to the tragic events yet to unfold in the play.
GLOUCESTER:
“Though the wisdom of nature can reason it thus and thus, yet nature finds itself scourged by the sequent effects. Love cools, friendship falls off, brothers divide; in cities, mutinies; in countries, discord; in palaces, treason; and the bond cracked ’twixt son and father.”
- Explanation: Gloucester reflects on the natural order of the world, observing that although reason can explain these disruptions, the consequences still manifest in the world. The breakdown of familial bonds is the primary concern here, symbolizing larger societal breakdowns.
- Language Devices:
- List: The listing of social disruptions (“love cools, friendship falls off…”) shows the widespread effects of the breakdown in order.
- Antithesis: The contrast between the reasoning of nature and the “scourged” effects emphasizes the tragic imbalance in the world.
- Alliteration: “Scourged by the sequent effects” uses repeated consonant sounds to emphasize the ongoing suffering.
GLOUCESTER:
“This villain of mine comes under the prediction: there’s son against father.”
- Explanation: Gloucester declares that Edmund fits the ominous prophecy of son against father, explicitly accusing him of being the villain.
- Language Devices:
- Foreshadowing: Gloucester’s recognition that Edmund fulfills the prophecy hints at the tragic conflict between father and son that will soon unfold.
GLOUCESTER:
“The King falls from bias of nature: there’s father against child.”
- Explanation: Gloucester expands his observation to include the breakdown of the relationship between King Lear and his children, paralleling his own situation. This reinforces the theme of family conflict and betrayal.
- Language Devices:
- Parallelism: “Father against child” mirrors the earlier line “son against father,” creating a symmetry that highlights the reversal of natural bonds.
GLOUCESTER:
“We have seen the best of our time. Machinations, hollowness, treachery, and all ruinous disorders follow us disquietly to our graves.”
- Explanation: Gloucester reflects on the decay of virtue in his world, expressing a sense of hopelessness. He laments the downfall of society, where deceit and corruption lead to inevitable destruction.
- Language Devices:
- Alliteration: “Machinations, hollowness, treachery” emphasizes the destructive forces at play.
- Foreshadowing: The imagery of “ruinous disorders” and “graves” foreshadows the tragic events that will lead to death and destruction.
GLOUCESTER:
“Find out this villain, Edmund. It shall lose thee nothing. Do it carefully.”
- Explanation: Gloucester orders Edmund to find out more about the betrayal, reiterating that Edmund’s actions will not harm him. Gloucester’s trust in Edmund is still intact.
- Language Devices:
- Imperative tone: The command is firm, showing that Gloucester is fully relying on Edmund to resolve the situation.
GLOUCESTER:
“And the noble and true-hearted Kent banished! His offense, honesty! ’Tis strange.”
- Explanation: Gloucester ends by lamenting the banishment of Kent, who was punished for his integrity. This further illustrates the corruption of the times, where virtue is punished, and vice is rewarded.
- Language Devices:
- Irony: Gloucester’s remark about Kent’s banishment highlights the tragic irony in the play, where righteousness is punished, and treachery is allowed to thrive.
EDMUND:
“This is the excellent foppery of the world, that when we are sick in fortune (often the surfeits of our own behavior) we make guilty of our disasters the sun, the moon, and stars, as if we were villains on necessity; fools by heavenly compulsion; knaves, thieves, and treachers by spherical predominance; drunkards, liars, and adulterers by an enforced obedience of planetary influence; and all that we are evil in, by a divine thrusting on.”
- Explanation: Edmund mocks the human tendency to blame fate or the celestial bodies for their misfortune, asserting that people often attribute their flaws or mistakes to the stars. He criticizes the belief that people are merely acting under the influence of fate—suggesting that people are not “villains” by necessity, but rather because of their own choices. He sees it as an excuse for personal failings, like being “drunkards” or “liars.”
- Language Devices:
- Rhetorical Question: “As if we were villains on necessity?” Edmund sarcastically challenges the idea that people are villains due to fate.
- Satire: Edmund satirizes how people blame their behavior on astrological forces instead of taking responsibility for their actions.
- Irony: Edmund criticizes others for blaming fate when, in fact, he himself is manipulating circumstances for his benefit.
EDMUND:
“An admirable evasion of whoremaster man, to lay his goatish disposition on the charge of a star!”
- Explanation: Edmund sarcastically praises the idea of blaming one’s immoral behavior, such as lust or promiscuity, on the stars. He refers to it as an “admirable evasion,” meaning it’s a clever excuse for poor behavior.
- Language Devices:
- Sarcasm: Edmund uses sarcasm to imply that it’s an absurdly clever excuse for immoral actions.
- Metaphor: “Goatish disposition” is a metaphor for someone who has a lascivious or lecherous nature, associating such behavior with goats.
EDMUND:
“My father compounded with my mother under the Dragon’s tail, and my nativity was under Ursa Major, so that it follows I am rough and lecherous.”
- Explanation: Edmund mockingly explains that he was born under certain astrological signs (the “Dragon’s tail” and “Ursa Major”), and therefore, his rough and lecherous nature is supposedly determined by the stars. He is sarcastically claiming that his bad character is a result of his astrological birth, rejecting any idea of personal responsibility.
- Language Devices:
- Astrological references: “Dragon’s tail” refers to a lunar node in astrology, while “Ursa Major” is a constellation. Edmund uses these to humorously claim his vices are destined.
- Hyperbole: By stating that he is “rough and lecherous” due to his birth under these signs, Edmund exaggerates the astrological influence to mock the idea that one’s fate or character is determined by the stars.
EDMUND:
“Fut, I should have been that I am, had the maidenliest star in the firmament twinkled on my bastardizing.”
- Explanation: Edmund dismisses the idea of fate entirely, asserting that he would have been the same person even if the “maidenliest star” had been twinkling when he was born. He implies that his character is not determined by the stars but by his own nature, rejecting the idea that his illegitimate birth has anything to do with his current vices.
- Language Devices:
- Irony: Edmund ironically states that even the most “pure” star would not have changed his nature, implying that his vices are his own choice, not a matter of fate.
- Metaphor: “Bastardizing” refers to Edmund’s illegitimate birth, but he uses it here to humorously claim that even the most virtuous star wouldn’t have altered his character.
EDMUND:
“Edgar— and pat he comes like the catastrophe of the old comedy. My cue is villainous melancholy, with a sigh like Tom o’ Bedlam.”
- Explanation: Edmund sees his brother Edgar approaching and sarcastically compares him to the “catastrophe of the old comedy,” implying that Edgar’s arrival is a predictable and over-the-top dramatic event. Edmund is preparing to adopt the role of a villain with “villainous melancholy,” a false display of sadness. He likens his future performance to “Tom o’ Bedlam,” a character associated with madness, showing his theatricality.
- Language Devices:
- Allusion: “Tom o’ Bedlam” refers to a popular character in English folklore and theatre who was mad, highlighting Edmund’s role as a manipulator and deceiver.
- Metaphor: “Villainous melancholy” is the role Edmund plans to take on to deceive others and manipulate the situation.
- Dramatic Irony: Edmund’s self-awareness of playing a role—pretending to be melancholy—adds irony to the scene, as the audience knows he is deceitful.
EDMUND:
“O, these eclipses do portend these divisions. Fa, sol, la, mi.”
- Explanation: Edmund refers to the “eclipses,” which in the context of the play symbolize disruptions to the natural order and chaos. He ties these eclipses to the divisions and chaos he is fostering in the kingdom. The random musical notes at the end of the line (“Fa, sol, la, mi”) add a surreal, disjointed quality to his speech, indicating his detached and chaotic nature as he manipulates those around him.
- Language Devices:
- Allusion: The “eclipses” refer to astronomical events, but in the context of the play, they symbolize the moral and social disorder in the kingdom.
- Musical reference: “Fa, sol, la, mi” are notes from a musical scale. Their inclusion here reflects discord and confusion, aligning with the chaotic atmosphere Edmund is helping to create.
🗨️ EDGAR:
“How now, brother Edmund, what serious contemplation are you in?”
- Explanation: Edgar greets Edmund and asks what he’s so deeply thinking about.
- Language Devices: Rhetorical question, gentle and curious tone.
- Themes: Family, deception.
- Analysis: This sets the stage. Edgar is trusting, unaware of Edmund’s scheming.
🗨️ EDMUND:
“I am thinking, brother, of a prediction I read this other day, what should follow these eclipses.”
- Explanation: Edmund claims he’s thinking about a prophecy linked to recent eclipses.
- Language Devices: Irony – Edmund pretends to believe in fate to manipulate.
- Themes: Nature vs. superstition, fate vs. free will.
- Analysis: He mocks superstition, but uses it to manipulate Edgar and others.
🗨️ EDGAR:
“Do you busy yourself with that?”
- Explanation: Edgar is surprised Edmund is interested in such things.
- Tone: Slightly skeptical, teasing.
- Themes: Rationality vs. superstition.
- Analysis: Edgar is sensible here, further showing how Edmund contrasts him by using false logic.
🗨️ EDMUND:
“I promise you, the effects he writes of succeed unhappily…” (continues)
- Explanation: Edmund lists terrible things said to come from eclipses—family conflict, political chaos, etc.
- Language Devices:
- List: Builds tension with a rapid list of misfortunes.
- Imagery: “dissolution of ancient amities”, “nuptial breaches”.
- Tone: Ominous, falsely prophetic.
- Themes: Chaos in nature and state, family breakdown.
- Analysis: Edmund invents or exaggerates predictions to seed doubt and fear. He uses language to distract Edgar.
🗨️ EDGAR:
“How long have you been a sectary astronomical?”
- Explanation: Edgar jokes, asking since when Edmund became a follower of astrology.
- Language Devices: Irony, sarcasm.
- Themes: Belief vs. skepticism.
- Analysis: Edgar remains light-hearted, not catching Edmund’s manipulation yet.
🗨️ EDMUND:
“Come, come, when saw you my father last?”
- Explanation: Edmund abruptly changes the subject to manipulate Edgar.
- Themes: Betrayal, manipulation.
- Analysis: A shift to urgency. He’s working his plan—turning father against son and vice versa.
🗨️ EDGAR:
“The night gone by.”
- Explanation: Edgar replies he saw their father (Gloucester) last night.
- Tone: Honest, unsuspecting.
- Themes: Innocence.
- Analysis: Edgar’s simplicity makes him an easy target.
🗨️ EDMUND:
“Spake you with him?”
- Explanation: Did you talk to him?
- Analysis: Leading question. Edmund is creating a narrative.
🗨️ EDGAR:
“Ay, two hours together.”
- Explanation: Yes, we talked for two hours.
- Themes: Trust.
- Analysis: Edgar still doesn’t sense danger—he feels close to their father.
🗨️ EDMUND:
“Parted you in good terms?… displeasure in him…?”
- Explanation: Were you on good terms? Did he show any anger?
- Language Devices: Leading and suggestive questions.
- Themes: Suspicion.
- Analysis: Edmund is planting seeds of fear and uncertainty in Edgar.
🗨️ EDGAR:
“None at all.”
- Explanation: No, he wasn’t angry.
- Tone: Calm.
- Themes: Naivety.
- Analysis: Edgar continues to trust both his father and brother.
🗨️ EDMUND:
“Bethink yourself wherein you may have offended him…”
- Explanation: Think about how you may have upset him. Stay away for a while.
- Language Devices: Imperative mood, false concern.
- Themes: Deceit, fear, family betrayal.
- Analysis: He’s isolating Edgar and creating a false danger.
🗨️ EDGAR:
“Some villain hath done me wrong.”
- Explanation: Someone has wronged me.
- Language Devices: Dramatic irony – audience knows it’s Edmund.
- Themes: Injustice, betrayal.
- Analysis: Edgar starts suspecting foul play, but not the right person.
🗨️ EDMUND:
“That’s my fear… forbearance… rage goes slower…”
- Explanation: Yes, I fear the same. Stay hidden until father’s anger calms.
- Themes: Appearance vs. reality.
- Analysis: He pretends to protect Edgar while actually setting him up.
🗨️ EDMUND:
“There’s my key. If you do stir abroad, go armed.”
- Explanation: Here’s my key. If you go outside, take a weapon.
- Language Devices: Symbolism (key = trust/freedom), tension.
- Themes: Danger, trust, manipulation.
- Analysis: He creates a false sense of urgency and danger.
🗨️ EDGAR:
“Armed, brother?”
- Explanation: Armed? (confused and worried)
- Tone: Shocked.
- Analysis: Edgar is slowly becoming suspicious, but it’s too late.
🗨️ EDMUND:
“Brother, I advise you… I have told you what I have seen…”
- Explanation: I’m only warning you. I’ve told you only a part of it.
- Language Devices: Understatement, suspense.
- Themes: Betrayal, illusion.
- Analysis: Edmund strengthens the illusion of danger and himself as protector.
🗨️ EDMUND:
“Pray you, away.”
- Explanation: Please go now.
- Tone: Forceful and final.
- Analysis: He wants Edgar out so he can manipulate Gloucester next.
🗨️ EDGAR:
“Shall I hear from you anon?”
- Explanation: “Will I hear from you soon?”
- Tone: Trusting, hopeful.
- Themes: Brotherhood, trust.
- Analysis: Edgar still believes Edmund is on his side. This shows just how deeply he’s been deceived.
🗨️ EDMUND:
“I do serve you in this business.”
- Explanation: “I’m serving you in this matter” (pretending to protect him).
- Language Devices: Double meaning / irony – he’s pretending to help Edgar but is actually serving his own interests.
- Themes: Betrayal, manipulation.
- Analysis: A chilling line because of the dramatic irony – we know Edmund is the one plotting Edgar’s downfall.
[Edgar exits]
- Stage Direction: Marks Edgar’s vulnerability and his exit from safety, both literally and metaphorically.
- Themes: Isolation, victimhood.
- Analysis: Edmund is now free to reveal his thoughts to the audience.
🗨️ EDMUND (soliloquy)
“A credulous father and a brother noble,”
- Explanation: “A gullible father and a noble brother.”
- Language Devices: Character contrast – Edmund outlines the flaws of those around him.
- Themes: Intelligence vs. naivety, power.
- Analysis: Edmund sees others’ virtues (like Gloucester’s trust and Edgar’s honor) as weaknesses he can exploit.
“Whose nature is so far from doing harms / That he suspects none;”
- Explanation: Edgar is so kind that he doesn’t even think people can be cruel.
- Language Devices: Contrast, irony.
- Themes: Goodness vs. evil, innocence.
- Analysis: Edmund disdains Edgar’s innocence—it makes him an easy target.
“On whose foolish honesty / My practices ride easy.”
- Explanation: “I can use his honest nature to easily carry out my tricks.”
- Language Devices: Metaphor – “ride easy” = take advantage of.
- Themes: Deception, exploitation.
- Analysis: Honesty becomes a tool for manipulation in Edmund’s hands. He sees goodness as foolishness.
“I see the business.”
- Explanation: “I see how this plan will work.”
- Tone: Cold, calculating.
- Themes: Ambition, cunning.
- Analysis: A turning point—Edmund is confident and sees a clear path to power.
“Let me, if not by birth, have lands by wit.”
- Explanation: “If I can’t inherit by birth, I’ll get power through my intelligence.”
- Language Devices: Antithesis – “birth” vs. “wit”; rhyme: gives it punch and finality.
- Themes: Legitimacy, ambition, merit vs. inheritance.
- Analysis: Edmund resents his illegitimate status. This line encapsulates his entire motive.
“All with me’s meet that I can fashion fit.”
- Explanation: “Whatever works for me, I’ll shape to my purpose.”
- Language Devices: Alliteration (“meet…make…fashion fit”), ambiguous phrasing.
- Themes: Manipulation, self-determination, opportunism.
- Analysis: He’s willing to twist anything to serve his goal. Ruthlessness and flexibility are his tools.
Leave a Reply