Hamlet Act 1 Scene 2 Line by Line Explanation, Analysis, Language Devices, and Themes

Act 1, scene 2

Scene 2

Synopsis:

In an audience chamber in Elsinore, Claudius, the new king of Denmark, holds court. After thanking his courtiers for their recent support, he dispatches ambassadors to Norway to halt a threatened attack from Fortinbras. He gives Laertes permission to return to France but denies Hamlet’s request to return to the university in Wittenberg. Hamlet, mourning for his father’s death, is left alone to vent his despair at what he regards as his mother’s all too hasty marriage to his uncle, Claudius. The audience learns that the marriage took place “within a month” of the former king’s death.

Horatio, Barnardo, and Marcellus arrive and tell Hamlet about the Ghost. Hamlet makes plans to join them that night.

Flourish. Enter Claudius, King of Denmark, Gertrude the
Queen, the Council, as Polonius, and his son Laertes,
Hamlet, with others, among them Voltemand and
Cornelius.

“Though yet of Hamlet our dear brother’s death / The memory be green,”

Meaning: The memory of the old King Hamlet’s death is still very fresh.

Analysis: Claudius begins by acknowledging grief, which makes him look respectful and empathetic. It’s a political move: he recognizes pain before pivoting to business.

Devices: “Green” = metaphor for freshness, rawness.

Themes: Death, mourning, time, appearance of respect.

“and that it us befitted / To bear our hearts in grief, and our whole kingdom / To be contracted in one brow of woe,”

Meaning: It was right for us to grieve, both personally and as a whole nation.

Analysis: Claudius stresses unity — king and country shared the same sorrow. This builds the image of solidarity.

Devices: Personification (“kingdom contracted in one brow”), image of the whole state frowning together.

Themes: Duty, collective mourning, public vs private grief.

“Yet so far hath discretion fought with nature / That we with wisest sorrow think on him / Together with remembrance of ourselves.”

Meaning: But reason (discretion) has fought with natural feelings (grief), so we balance sorrow for the dead king with the need to look after ourselves and the kingdom.

Analysis: Claudius frames his restraint as wisdom — grief checked by political necessity. It also justifies moving on quickly.

Devices: Antithesis (discretion vs nature); personification (“discretion fought with nature”).

Themes: Reason vs emotion, leadership, appearance vs reality.

“Therefore our sometime sister, now our queen, / Th’ imperial jointress to this warlike state,”

Meaning: That’s why we have married our former sister-in-law (Gertrude), who is now queen and joint ruler of Denmark.

Analysis: He smooths over the awkwardness of marrying his brother’s widow by calling her “sometime sister.” He emphasizes the political legitimacy of her role as queen.

Devices: Euphemism (“sometime sister”), formal/imperial titles.

Themes: Marriage as politics, legitimacy, family power.

“Have we (as ’twere with a defeated joy, / With an auspicious and a dropping eye, / With mirth in funeral and with dirge in marriage, / In equal scale weighing delight and dole) / Taken to wife.”

Meaning: We married her with mixed emotions: joy blended with sorrow, happiness at marriage balanced with grief at death.

Analysis: Claudius tries to reframe a rushed, suspicious marriage as something noble and balanced. He turns paradox into proof of his “wisdom.”

Devices: Oxymorons (“mirth in funeral,” “dirge in marriage”); imagery of scales balancing opposites; antithesis.

Themes: Appearance vs reality, manipulation, duality of human experience.

“Nor have we herein barred / Your better wisdoms, which have freely gone / With this affair along. For all, our thanks.”

Meaning: We didn’t act without you — you, the wise men of Denmark, supported this marriage. Thank you.

Analysis: Claudius flatters the court and implies their approval, even if it wasn’t wholehearted. It’s a tactic to silence criticism.

Devices: Flattery (“your better wisdoms”), inclusive “we.”

Themes: Legitimacy, politics, persuasion.

“Now follows that you know. Young Fortinbras, / Holding a weak supposal of our worth / Or thinking by our late dear brother’s death / Our state to be disjoint and out of frame,”

Meaning: Now, as you know, young Fortinbras thinks we’re weak after King Hamlet’s death and that Denmark is disorganized.

Analysis: Claudius pivots to foreign policy. He portrays Fortinbras as rash and presumptuous. This makes Claudius look steady and competent by contrast.

Devices: Dismissive phrasing (“weak supposal of our worth”), metaphor (“state disjoint and out of frame” = Denmark as a broken machine/body).

Themes: Strength vs weakness, foreign threat, continuity after death.

“Colleaguèd with this dream of his advantage, / He hath not failed to pester us with message / Importing the surrender of those lands / Lost by his father, with all bonds of law, / To our most valiant brother—so much for him.”

Meaning: Taking advantage of our situation, Fortinbras keeps sending demands for the lands his father lost to King Hamlet, even though by law they belong to us. Anyway, that’s him dealt with for now.

Analysis: Claudius dismisses Fortinbras’s claim as both annoying (“pester us”) and illegitimate (“bonds of law” support Denmark). The praise of “our most valiant brother” reminds the court of past Danish power.

Devices: Legal diction (“bonds of law”), dismissive aside (“so much for him”).

Themes: Law vs force, inheritance, memory of the dead king.

“Now for ourself and for this time of meeting. / Thus much the business is: we have here writ / To Norway, uncle of young Fortinbras,”

Meaning: Now, to business: we’ve written to the King of Norway, Fortinbras’s uncle.

Analysis: Claudius shows his authority through calm, controlled diplomacy. He makes it look like he’s solving the problem lawfully.

Devices: Formal tone, official diction (“business,” “writ”).

Themes: Diplomacy vs war, order, control.

“Who, impotent and bedrid, scarcely hears / Of this his nephew’s purpose, to suppress / His further gait herein,”

Meaning: The old King of Norway is sick and bedridden, hardly aware of Fortinbras’s schemes, so we’re asking him to stop his nephew’s plans.

Analysis: Claudius portrays the uncle as weak, which undermines Fortinbras’s authority. Again, Claudius is showing his clever management.

Devices: Blunt description (“impotent and bedrid”) = diminishes the Norwegian throne.

Themes: Weakness vs strength, generational change, political opportunism.

“in that the levies, / The lists, and full proportions are all made / Out of his subject;”

Meaning: Because Fortinbras is raising his armies from the uncle’s subjects.

Analysis: Claudius stresses that the uncle has the power (and responsibility) to stop Fortinbras. This shifts blame and responsibility onto Norway’s king.

Devices: Military/legal language (“levies,” “lists,” “proportions”) = formality, precision.

Themes: Law, sovereignty, control of armies.

“and we here dispatch / You, good Cornelius, and you, Voltemand, / For bearers of this greeting to old Norway,”

Meaning: Therefore, we’re sending you, Cornelius and Voltemand, as messengers to the King of Norway.

Analysis: Naming them in public makes it official. It also demonstrates Claudius’s authority in assigning diplomatic tasks.

Devices: Direct address, public formality.

Themes: Diplomacy, kingship, ceremony.

“Giving to you no further personal power / To business with the King more than the scope / Of these dilated articles allow.”

Meaning: You don’t have authority to negotiate beyond what is written in these instructions. Stick to the script.

Analysis: Claudius insists on control: the ambassadors have no freedom. This shows his preference for tight regulation and order.

Devices: Legal phrasing (“dilated articles”), limitation through syntax (long sentence, emphasis on restriction).

Themes: Authority, order, control, mistrust.

“Giving them a paper. / Farewell, and let your haste commend your duty.”

Meaning: Claudius hands Cornelius and Voltemand written instructions, telling them to go quickly — their promptness will show their loyalty.

Analysis: Claudius is formal and commanding, but polite. It shows how he expects obedience and equates speed with respect.

Devices: Symbolism — the paper represents bureaucracy and Claudius’s preference for controlled, written orders.

Themes: Kingship, authority, obedience, diplomacy.

CORNELIUS/VOLTEMAND: “In that and all things will we show our duty.”

Meaning: They promise loyalty in this and everything else.

Analysis: The ambassadors model the “ideal” subjects: obedient, unquestioning, deferential. Claudius gets to display his authority publicly through their submission.

Devices: Repetition of “duty” reinforces feudal loyalty.

Themes: Duty, hierarchy, obedience, performance of loyalty.

KING: “We doubt it nothing. Heartily farewell.”

Meaning: Claudius says he has no doubt of their loyalty and bids them farewell warmly.

Analysis: A courteous dismissal — Claudius blends authority with politeness. It’s part of his charm and political tact.

Devices: Certainty (“doubt it nothing”) emphasizes trust.

Themes: Authority, manipulation, appearances.

“And now, Laertes, what’s the news with you? / You told us of some suit. What is ’t, Laertes?”

Meaning: Claudius now turns to Laertes, asking about the request (suit) he mentioned earlier.

Analysis: Notice how Claudius smoothly shifts from state politics to personal petitions. It shows his skill in balancing public and private matters.

Devices: Direct address — the king speaks to Laertes by name, a personal touch.

Themes: Kingship, duty, balance of power between ruler and subjects.

“You cannot speak of reason to the Dane / And lose your voice.”

Meaning: Claudius reassures Laertes that he can always speak freely to the King of Denmark without being ignored.

Analysis: Claudius presents himself as approachable and benevolent — an image of an accessible king. But this is also political flattery; he positions himself as generous while reminding Laertes of hierarchy (“the Dane”).

Devices: Metonymy (“the Dane” = Claudius himself); rhetoric of reassurance.

Themes: Authority, kingship, persuasion.

“What wouldst thou beg, Laertes, / That shall not be my offer, not thy asking?”

Meaning: What could you possibly ask for that I haven’t already been willing to give?

Analysis: This is kingly generosity, but also self-aggrandizing. Claudius makes it sound like he anticipates and fulfills all needs before they’re even spoken.

Devices: Hyperbole (he promises to give more than Laertes could even ask).

Themes: Power dynamics, patronage, generosity as control.

“The head is not more native to the heart, / The hand more instrumental to the mouth, / Than is the throne of Denmark to thy father.”

Meaning: Just as the head is naturally joined to the heart, and the hand serves the mouth, so the throne of Denmark is naturally joined to your father (Polonius).

Analysis: Claudius flatters Polonius through Laertes, emphasizing how vital Polonius is to the crown. This sets up Claudius as a king who values loyalty and repays it with favor.

Devices: Similes (“head…heart,” “hand…mouth”) create natural imagery of unity and dependence.

Themes: Duty, loyalty, flattery, power structures.

“What wouldst thou have, Laertes?”

Meaning: So, what exactly do you want?

Analysis: Claudius circles back to the petition. The repetition makes him sound both generous and probing — he wants clarity before granting.

Devices: Repetition, rhetorical directness.

Themes: Authority, benevolence, patronage.

LAERTES: “My dread lord, / Your leave and favor to return to France,”

Meaning: Laertes asks permission to return to France.

Analysis: Notice the deference: he calls Claudius “dread lord.” His tone is respectful, but he makes his request clear.

Devices: Formal courtly diction (“dread lord,” “favor”).

Themes: Duty vs desire, obedience, the younger generation’s freedoms.

“From whence though willingly I came to Denmark / To show my duty in your coronation,”

Meaning: He says he came back to Denmark willingly to show loyalty at Claudius’s coronation.

Analysis: Laertes demonstrates loyalty first, then pivots to personal desires. This shows how courtiers must balance public duty with private freedom.

Devices: Contrast — “willingly came” vs “now want to leave.”

Themes: Duty, loyalty, family vs personal freedom.

“Yet now I must confess, that duty done, / My thoughts and wishes bend again toward France / And bow them to your gracious leave and pardon.”

Meaning: Now that my duty here is done, my heart is pulling me back to France — but I need your permission and forgiveness to go.

Analysis: Laertes frames his request humbly, as if it’s not rebellion but natural longing. His deference to Claudius (“bow them to your gracious leave”) reinforces hierarchy.

Devices: Personification (“thoughts and wishes bend”), bowing imagery = submission.

Themes: Duty vs desire, freedom, power and hierarchy.

KING: “Have you your father’s leave? What says Polonius?”

Meaning: Claudius doesn’t answer right away — instead, he asks if Laertes has his father’s (Polonius’s) permission.

Analysis: This shows Claudius respects (and maybe depends on) Polonius’s authority as a father and counselor. It also underscores the importance of patriarchal order: sons need fathers’ approval before the king’s.

Devices: Direct question, rhetorical delay.

Themes: Authority, family hierarchy, obedience to father figures.

POLONIUS

“Hath, my lord, wrung from me my slow leave”

Explanation: Laertes has forced him to give permission to return to France, though Polonius was reluctant.

Analysis: Polonius presents himself as cautious and hesitant, emphasizing his authority as father.

Devices: Metaphor “wrung” = like squeezing liquid, showing Laertes pressed hard.

Themes: Parental control, obedience.

“By laborsome petition, and at last”

Explanation: Laertes had to work hard and ask repeatedly before Polonius agreed.

Analysis: Shows Polonius’s fussiness and Laertes’s persistence.

Devices: Diction “laborsome” stresses effort.

Themes: Struggle between youth’s wishes and parental restraint.

“Upon his will I sealed my hard consent.”

Explanation: Finally, Polonius gave reluctant permission.

Analysis: “Hard consent” = Polonius wants credit for yielding, but unwillingly.

Devices: Metaphor of “sealed” like stamping authority on a decision.

Themes: Authority, reluctant approval.

“I do beseech you give him leave to go.”

Explanation: He asks the King to also grant permission.

Analysis: Deferential tone, showing the King’s ultimate authority.

Themes: Obedience to monarchy, hierarchy.

KING

“Take thy fair hour, Laertes. Time be thine,”

Explanation: Claudius gives Laertes leave, wishing him well.

Analysis: A generous gesture, contrasting with Hamlet’s treatment.

Themes: Authority, reward for loyalty.

“And thy best graces spend it at thy will.—”

Explanation: He hopes Laertes spends his time with dignity and wisely.

Analysis: Claudius flatters Laertes, securing loyalty.

Themes: Manipulation, political courtesy.

“But now, my cousin Hamlet and my son—”

Explanation: Claudius turns to Hamlet, calling him both cousin (nephew) and son (step-son).

Analysis: Forced intimacy; Claudius tries to legitimize marriage.

Devices: Dual title shows awkward, doubled relation.

Themes: Family corruption, strained kinship.

HAMLET, aside

“A little more than kin and less than kind.”

Explanation: Hamlet mutters—Claudius is more than just an uncle now, but less than natural/kind.

Analysis: Bitter pun, showing Hamlet’s contempt.

Devices: Pun: “Kind” = natural / kind-hearted.

Themes: Alienation, distrust, family tension.

KING

“How is it that the clouds still hang on you?”

Explanation: Claudius asks why Hamlet is still mourning.

Analysis: Insensitive—wants Hamlet to move on.

Devices: Metaphor “clouds” = gloom, grief.

Themes: Appearance vs. reality, grief vs. political image.

HAMLET

“Not so, my lord; I am too much in the sun.”

Explanation: Hamlet puns: outwardly, he says he’s not gloomy but “too much in the sun.” Really, he resents being Claudius’s “son.”

Analysis: A witty but bitter refusal of Claudius’s closeness.

Devices: Pun on “sun/son.”

Themes: Resistance, resentment, wit as defense.

QUEEN

“Good Hamlet, cast thy nighted color off,”

Explanation: Gertrude urges him to stop wearing black mourning clothes.

Analysis: She wants him to let go of grief for harmony’s sake.

Devices: Imagery: “nighted color” = dark clothes, sadness.

Themes: Grief, appearance vs. reality.

“And let thine eye look like a friend on Denmark.”

Explanation: She wants him to look cheerful and loyal.

Analysis: Tries to persuade him to support Claudius.

Themes: Duty vs. personal sorrow.

“Do not forever with thy vailèd lids”

Explanation: Don’t keep your eyes downcast in grief.

Analysis: Gertrude sees mourning as excessive.

Devices: Metaphor “vailèd lids” = eyes veiled with tears.

Themes: Misunderstood grief.

“Seek for thy noble father in the dust.”

Explanation: Stop searching for your dead father in the grave.

Analysis: Practical, but blunt—insensitive to Hamlet’s emotions.

Devices: Metaphor “dust” = death.

Themes: Mortality, remembrance.

“Thou know’st ’tis common; all that lives must die,”

Explanation: Death is universal, she reminds him.

Analysis: Rational, but cold—equates his grief with mere commonality.

Themes: Universality of death.

“Passing through nature to eternity.”

Explanation: Death is a natural passage to the afterlife.

Analysis: Gertrude comforts herself with this view, but Hamlet wants truth, not platitudes.

Themes: Nature, eternity, acceptance of death.

HAMLET

“Ay, madam, it is common.”

Explanation: He agrees death is common.

Analysis: Bitter, clipped—suggests she doesn’t understand his unique grief.

Themes: Death, individuality of sorrow.

QUEEN

“If it be,
Why seems it so particular with thee?”

Explanation: If death is common, why does it affect Hamlet so deeply?

Analysis: Shows her lack of empathy—she mistakes genuine grief for overreaction.

Themes: Misunderstanding between mother and son, appearance vs. reality.

HAMLET

“‘Seems,’ madam? Nay, it is. I know not ‘seems.’”

Explanation: Hamlet rejects the word “seems”—his grief is real, not pretended.

Analysis: This line defines Hamlet’s obsession with truth vs. appearance.

Devices: Repetition of “seems” emphasizes false appearances.

Themes: Authenticity, appearance vs. reality.

“’Tis not alone my inky cloak, good mother,”

Explanation: His grief is not just in his black clothes.

Devices: Imagery: “inky cloak” = mourning wear.

Themes: Outward show vs. inner reality.

“Nor customary suits of solemn black,”

Explanation: Nor the traditional black mourning outfits.

Themes: Outward mourning vs. true sorrow.

“Nor windy suspiration of forced breath,”

Explanation: Nor sighs and forced breathing.

Devices: Imagery of exaggerated sighs.

Themes: Superficial grief.

“No, nor the fruitful river in the eye,”

Explanation: Nor tears.

Devices: Metaphor: “fruitful river” = abundance of tears.

Themes: Outward vs. inward grief.

“Nor the dejected havior of the visage,”

Explanation: Nor a sad facial expression.

Devices: Diction “havior” = behavior of the face.

Themes: Performance vs. truth.

“Together with all forms, moods, shapes of grief,”

Explanation: Nor any other outward signs of mourning.

Themes: Surface gestures vs. real emotion.

“That can denote me truly. These indeed ‘seem,’”

Explanation: These things can’t truly express what he feels. They only “seem.”

Themes: Appearance vs. reality.

“For they are actions that a man might play;”

Explanation: Outward gestures can be faked, like acting.

Devices: Metaphor of grief as performance.

Themes: Performance vs. authenticity.

“But I have that within which passes show,”

Explanation: His real grief is inside, beyond outward display.
Themes: Inward truth vs. outward display.

“These but the trappings and the suits of woe.”

Explanation: Outward mourning clothes and signs are just decorations of grief, not grief itself.
Devices: Metaphor: “trappings” = costumes.
Themes: Appearance vs. reality, inner authenticity.

’Tis sweet and commendable in your nature,

Explanation: It’s good and praise-worthy in you (Hamlet).
Analysis: Claudius opens with flattery — he praises Hamlet to soften him and sound magnanimous. Politically savvy: compliment first, then request.
Language devices: elevated diction (“commendable”), archaic contraction (“’Tis”) to sound regal.
Themes: public politeness, rhetorical management of emotion.

Hamlet,

Explanation: Direct address to Hamlet.
Analysis: Brief vocative — makes the preceding compliment personal and intimate, pulling Hamlet into a private dialogue in public.
Language devices: vocative; pause effect (single name).
Themes: intimacy as political performance; family/power relationship.

To give these mourning duties to your father.

Explanation: To perform the proper mourning rites for your father.
Analysis: Claudius frames Hamlet’s grief as dutiful and appropriate — acknowledging it while preparing to limit it.
Devices: formal phrase “mourning duties” blends emotion with duty.
Themes: filial piety, public ritual vs private feeling.

But you must know your father lost a father,

Explanation: You should remember your father also had a father who died.
Analysis: He normalizes death by pointing out the generational chain — subtle move to diminish Hamlet’s exceptionalism.
Devices: repetition of “father” creates cyclical image.
Themes: universality of death, minimising individual grief.

That father lost, lost his, and the survivor bound

Explanation: Each generation loses its predecessor, and the survivor is obliged (by duty) to mourn.
Analysis: Claudius stresses customary duty rather than continuous sorrow — he’s steering Hamlet toward social norms.
Devices: compressed syntax, inversion (“lost, lost his”).
Themes: obligation, tradition as corrective.

In filial obligation for some term

Explanation: Out of sonly duty, one must mourn for a certain time.
Analysis: “Some term” implies mourning has a limit — a polite way to say “don’t linger.”
Devices: Latinate phrasing (“filial obligation”) gives moral authority.
Themes: prescribed mourning; social regulation of emotion.

To do obsequious sorrow. But to persever

Explanation: To perform proper funeral observances. But to continue…
Analysis: “Obsequious sorrow” evokes funeral rites (obsequies); Claudius recognizes formal grief but prepares to condemn excess.
Devices: wordplay with “obsequious/obsequies”; enjambment leads into criticism.
Themes: ritual vs. excess; ceremony.

In obstinate condolement is a course

Explanation: …to persist stubbornly in grieving is a course of action that…
Analysis: He calls prolonged mourning obstinate — framing Hamlet’s grief as moral failing rather than natural depth.
Devices: strong diction (“obstinate condolement” — formal, judgmental).
Themes: judgment of feeling; social pressure to conform.

Of impious stubbornness. ’Tis unmanly grief.

Explanation: It’s godless stubbornness. It’s not manly to grieve like that.
Analysis: Claudius attacks Hamlet on religious (impious) and gendered (unmanly) grounds — powerful shaming devices to force Hamlet inward.
Devices: moralizing language; blunt condemnation; contrastive label “unmanly.”
Themes: religion as norm; toxic masculinity; social control.

It shows a will most incorrect to heaven,

Explanation: It reveals a will opposed to God’s order.
Analysis: Invoking “heaven” raises stakes — not only social impropriety but spiritual error. Claudius uses divine language to moralize.
Devices: appeal to divine authority; moralizing rhetoric.
Themes: divine order vs human emotion; sacrilege accusation.

A heart unfortified, a mind impatient,

Explanation: It reveals a weak heart and an impatient mind.
Analysis: Listing personal defects — Claudius pathologizes Hamlet’s feelings as character flaws. It’s an attack that sounds clinical.
Devices: parallel structure; triadic rhythm (would expect a third item).
Themes: characterization through grief; leadership ideals (fortitude).

An understanding simple and unschooled.

Explanation: It shows he has a simple, untrained understanding.
Analysis: Claudius insults Hamlet’s intellect — “unschooled” suggests naivety, unfit for a prince. This undermines Hamlet’s credibility.
Devices: blunt pejorative diction; alliteration (“simple…unschooled”).
Themes: education, reason vs emotion, delegitimization.

For what we know must be and is as common

Explanation: Because what we know — death — is inevitable and ordinary.
Analysis: Claudius appeals to shared knowledge and common sense to argue Hamlet’s reaction is irrational. He insists on consensus truth.
Devices: abstract generalization, rhetorical bridging (“For…”).
Themes: inevitability, communal norms, appeal to commonsense.

As any the most vulgar thing to sense,

Explanation: As obvious as the most ordinary thing anyone can perceive.
Analysis: “Vulgar” = commonplace; he stresses death’s ordinariness to belittle Hamlet’s particular pain.
Devices: modifier “vulgar” (period sense = common), sensory appeal (“to sense”).
Themes: trivialization of grief, social leveling.

Why should we in our peevish opposition

Explanation: Why, in our petulant resistance,
Analysis: Rhetorical question — he frames Hamlet’s refusal to accept as childish (“peevish”), undermining his dignity.
Devices: rhetorical question; pejorative adjective.
Themes: infantilizing the mourner, pressure to conform.

Take it to heart? Fie, ’tis a fault to heaven,

Explanation: Take it so deeply? Shame — it’s an offense against God.
Analysis: He repeats moral language (“fie,” “fault to heaven”) to shame Hamlet and insist on quick reconciliation.
Devices: interjection “Fie!” (moral rebuke), repetition of “fault.”
Themes: religious condemnation, moralizing.

A fault against the dead, a fault to nature,

Explanation: A wrong toward the dead, and contrary to nature.
Analysis: Claudius piles on — grief is wrong toward multiple orders: the dead, nature itself. He broadens the accusation to make it seem universally wrong.
Devices: anaphora (“a fault… a fault…”), escalating condemnation.
Themes: transgression against social/natural order.

To reason most absurd, whose common theme

Explanation: And even to reason it is absurd; reason’s common lesson is…
Analysis: He personifies “reason” as an authority teaching the same truth repeatedly — that death is natural — so Hamlet’s grief conflicts with reason itself.
Devices: personification of “reason”; moral/scientific appeal.
Themes: reason vs passion; Enlightenment seed (value of reason).

Is death of fathers, and who still hath cried,

Explanation: Reason’s constant theme is that fathers die, and it has always said so.
Analysis: He uses historical continuity to make grief look pointless; it’s the recurring human condition.
Devices: abstract generalization; cumulative logic.
Themes: historical continuity of death; inevitability again.

From the first corse till he that died today,

Explanation: From the very first corpse to the man who just died today,
Analysis: Sweeping scope — Claudius uses hyperbole to flatten Hamlet’s unique experience into universal pattern.
Devices: synecdoche (“first corse”), dramatic chronology.
Themes: universality, fatalism.

“This must be so.”

Explanation: “This is how it must be” — the refrain of inevitability.
Analysis: Quoted, emphatic conclusion; Claudius uses fatalistic closure to silence dissent.
Devices: direct quote — a maxim; abrupt declarative.
Themes: inevitability, rhetorical closure.

We pray you, throw to earth

Explanation: We ask you to cast aside — throw down —
Analysis: A polite command disguised as a prayer; the language moves from public argument to direct appeal.
Devices: imperative with polite “we pray you” (soft command).
Themes: social pressure, command couched as petition.

This unprevailing woe and think of us

Explanation: …this useless grief and instead think of us (the royal family).
Analysis: “Unprevailing” implies the grief achieves nothing; Claudius requests loyalty over mourning — self-interest masked as care.
Devices: adjective “unprevailing” (rare/strong word), juxtaposition grief vs royal expectation.
Themes: political self-interest, utilitarianism over sentiment.

As of a father; for let the world take note,

Explanation: Think of me as your father; let the world notice it.
Analysis: Claudius asserts paternal role publicly — he wants Hamlet to accept him and he wants public recognition (legitimacy).
Devices: imperative “let the world take note” — claiming public authority.
Themes: legitimacy, paternal usurpation, performance of kingship.

You are the most immediate to our throne,

Explanation: You are the closest heir to the throne.
Analysis: Reminder of Hamlet’s political importance — flattering, but also a subtle threat: Hamlet’s grief should not endanger the realm’s continuity.
Devices: courtly phrasing “most immediate” = nearest in succession.
Themes: succession, political duty, pressure.

And with no less nobility of love

Explanation: And with no less noble love (than a real father has)
Analysis: Claudius claims he loves Hamlet nobly — a bid to equalize his marriage and step-fatherhood with real paternal feeling.
Devices: comparative phrasing; noble diction.
Themes: claimed affection, political paternalism.

Than that which dearest father bears his son

Explanation: Than the love a dear father bears his son.
Analysis: He explicitly compares his love to that of Hamlet’s dead father, trying to erase the difference. It’s manipulative — tries to replace Old Hamlet.
Devices: simile/comparative clause; sentimental rhetoric.
Themes: replacement of father, emotional usurpation.

Do I impart toward you. For your intent

Explanation: That is the love I give to you. Regarding your plan…
Analysis: “Impart” is formal — he bestows paternal affection like a gift, blending affection and authority. Then he pivots to Hamlet’s plans.
Devices: formal verb “impart”; pivot marker “For.”
Themes: patronage, conditional affection.

In going back to school in Wittenberg,

Explanation: Your plan to return to school in Wittenberg.
Analysis: Wittenberg is named specifically — a real university, associated with Protestant reformers (subtext for independence/thinking). Claudius frames Hamlet’s desire as a departure from court.
Devices: proper noun anchors the request in reality.
Themes: education vs duty, escape, intellectual autonomy.

It is most retrograde to our desire,

Explanation: It goes completely against what we want.
Analysis: “Retrograde” = moving backward; Claudius makes Hamlet’s desire seem anti-state and selfish.
Devices: evaluative adjective “most retrograde” (strong reprimand).
Themes: ruler’s will vs subject’s wish; backwardness vs progress.

And we beseech you, bend you to remain

Explanation: We beg you, please stay here.
Analysis: Again, a softened command — “beseech” is polite, but the king is exerting pressure. It’s both plea and directive.
Devices: humble verb “beseech” masks authority.
Themes: power masked as concern; compelled loyalty.

Here in the cheer and comfort of our eye,

Explanation: Stay here in the warmth and favor of our presence (our look).
Analysis: “Cheer and comfort of our eye” suggests being constantly under royal gaze — an offer of favor that includes surveillance. Very Claudius: beneficence + control.
Devices: metaphor (eye = presence/favor), cozy diction “cheer and comfort” masking monitoring.
Themes: favour as control, visibility/surveillance.

Our chiefest courtier, cousin, and our son.

Explanation: Be our chief courtier, our kinsman, and our son.
Analysis: The triad lists the roles Claudius wants Hamlet to occupy — political partner, family, and replacement son. It’s the ultimate demand for Hamlet’s public conformity.
Devices: tricolon (threefold list) gives rhetorical force; repeated possessive “our” asserts Claudius’s ownership/claim.
Themes: identity imposition, role expectation, conflation of family and state.

QUEEN

Let not thy mother lose her prayers, Hamlet.

Explanation: Don’t let me, your mother, beg in vain.
Analysis: Gertrude appeals to Hamlet emotionally, framing her request as a “prayer” rather than an order. It’s softer than Claudius’s command.
Language device: Religious metaphor (“prayers”) elevates her request.
Themes: Maternal love; persuasion through emotion; prayer/religion.

I pray thee, stay with us. Go not to Wittenberg.

Explanation: I beg you, stay here in Denmark, don’t return to university.
Analysis: Her tone is pleading — unlike Claudius’s politic reasoning, Gertrude uses affection.
Language device: Repetition of “pray” (plea, not literal prayer) stresses her dependence on him.
Themes: Family ties vs independence.

HAMLET

I shall in all my best obey you, madam.

Explanation: I will do my best to obey you, mother.
Analysis: Hamlet obeys Gertrude, not Claudius. He frames his compliance as filial duty to his mother. It’s respectful but reserved (“my best” leaves distance).
Language device: Formal diction; “madam” keeps her at arm’s length.
Themes: Obedience vs inner resistance; loyalty to mother.

KING

Why, ’tis a loving and a fair reply.

Explanation: That’s a kind and reasonable answer.
Analysis: Claudius immediately claims Hamlet’s obedience as a victory for himself. He interprets it politically.
Language device: Public praise, flattery.
Themes: Power, manipulation.

Be as ourself in Denmark.—Madam, come.

Explanation: Remain here, as if you were my own self, Hamlet. Now, Madam, let us go.
Analysis: Claudius elevates Hamlet by calling him “ourself,” but this is also a way of binding him under his authority. Then he turns his attention away, satisfied.
Language device: Royal plural “ourself” emphasizes kingship.
Themes: Succession; Claudius’s desire to control appearances.

This gentle and unforced accord of Hamlet

Explanation: Hamlet’s easy and voluntary agreement…
Analysis: Claudius presents Hamlet’s obedience as willing (“unforced”), though it was pressured. This spin manages public perception.
Device: Dramatic irony — audience knows Hamlet is anything but unforced.
Themes: Appearance vs reality; political manipulation.

Sits smiling to my heart, in grace whereof

Explanation: Brings joy to my heart, so much so that…
Analysis: Claudius uses exaggerated language — presenting family harmony as heartfelt.
Device: Personification (“sits smiling”).
Themes: Image of unity; deceptive joy.

No jocund health that Denmark drinks today

Explanation: No joyful toast made in Denmark today…
Analysis: Claudius shifts from private joy to public celebration — everything is about national image.
Device: “Jocund health” = cheerful toast, formal diction.
Themes: Festivity masking grief.

But the great cannon to the clouds shall tell,

Explanation: But it will be accompanied by cannon fire to the skies.
Analysis: Claudius links personal (family compliance) to national ritual (celebration with cannon fire).
Device: Hyperbole, grandeur.
Themes: State power; public spectacle.

And the King’s rouse the heaven shall bruit again,

Explanation: And the king’s drinking toast will echo loudly up to heaven.
Analysis: The drinking custom (rouse) is turned into cosmic event — Claudius equates royal drinking with thunder.
Device: Hyperbole, cosmic imagery.
Themes: Excess; king’s indulgence.

Respeaking earthly thunder. Come away.

Explanation: Echoing the thunder on earth. Let’s go.
Analysis: Claudius concludes with theatrical flourish — blending heaven and earth imagery to dramatize his reign.
Device: Blending natural (thunder) with artificial (cannon).
Themes: Kingship as spectacle; artificial vs natural.

Flourish. All but Hamlet exit.

Stage direction: Court leaves in ceremony. Hamlet remains, isolated.
Themes: Isolation of the protagonist; contrast between public festivity and private despair.

HAMLET — Soliloquy

O, that this too, too sullied flesh would melt,

Explanation: Oh, that this stained, sinful flesh could just dissolve.
Analysis: Hamlet’s suicidal longing begins. “Sullied” reflects moral corruption, perhaps contamination by his mother’s marriage.
Device: Metaphor of flesh melting; repeated “too, too” intensifies despair.
Themes: Suicide; body as prison; corruption.

Thaw, and resolve itself into a dew,

Explanation: That it might thaw and turn into dew.
Analysis: Continues the imagery of melting into nothing — desire for annihilation.
Device: Nature imagery; metaphor of transformation.
Themes: Escape, impermanence.

Or that the Everlasting had not fixed

Explanation: Or that God (the eternal one) had not decreed…
Analysis: Acknowledges divine law — suicide is forbidden by God.
Device: Religious epithet “the Everlasting.”
Themes: Religion vs despair; divine prohibition.

His canon ’gainst self-slaughter! O God, God,

Explanation: His law against suicide! Oh God!
Analysis: Hamlet’s anguish — torn between desire to die and God’s law.
Device: Exclamation, repetition (“O God, God”).
Themes: Conflict between faith and despair.

How weary, stale, flat, and unprofitable

Explanation: How tiring, dull, empty, and useless…
Analysis: Four adjectives in sequence capture depression’s deadening effect.
Device: Asyndetic list (no “and” until last), accumulative despair.
Themes: Meaninglessness of life; depression.

Seem to me all the uses of this world!

Explanation: …all the purposes of this world appear to me.
Analysis: Hamlet finds no value in anything. Nihilistic tone.
Device: Generalization “all the uses.”
Themes: Loss of purpose; existentialism.

Fie on ’t, ah fie! ’Tis an unweeded garden

Explanation: Shame on it! It’s like an untended garden.
Analysis: First metaphor: the world as a neglected garden, full of rot.
Device: Extended metaphor (world = garden).
Themes: Corruption, decay, disorder.

That grows to seed. Things rank and gross in nature

Explanation: Left to go to seed, overrun with weeds and filth.
Analysis: Suggests Denmark has decayed morally since Claudius’s reign began.
Device: Imagery of rankness, decay.
Themes: Corruption; fallen nature.

Possess it merely. That it should come to this:

Explanation: Filth completely overtakes it. How terrible it’s come to this.
Analysis: Lament at the state of the world and court.
Device: Exclamation, despairing tone.
Themes: Disorder, loss.

But two months dead—nay, not so much, not two.

Explanation: Only two months dead — no, not even two.
Analysis: Shock at how quickly his mother remarried. Time feels compressed.
Device: Correction (self-interruption).
Themes: Haste; memory vs forgetfulness.

So excellent a king, that was to this

Explanation: My father was such an excellent king, compared to this…
Analysis: Sets up comparison between Old Hamlet and Claudius.
Themes: Idealization of father; failed succession.

Hyperion to a satyr; so loving to my mother

Explanation: Like the sun-god Hyperion compared to a satyr.
Analysis: Mythological comparison elevates Old Hamlet, degrades Claudius.
Device: Simile, classical allusion.
Themes: Heroism vs debauchery.

That he might not beteem the winds of heaven

Explanation: He wouldn’t even let the wind blow harshly on her face.
Analysis: Old Hamlet is idealized as tender husband.
Device: Hyperbole, protective imagery.
Themes: Love, idealization, memory.

Visit her face too roughly. Heaven and Earth,

Explanation: He wouldn’t let even nature touch her harshly. Oh heavens!
Analysis: Hamlet’s astonishment at the contrast.
Device: Apostrophe (address to heaven and earth).
Themes: Contrast between past tenderness and present betrayal.

Must I remember? Why, she would hang on him

Explanation: Must I remember how she clung to him?
Analysis: Pain in remembering mother’s previous devotion.
Device: Rhetorical question.
Themes: Memory as torment.

As if increase of appetite had grown

Explanation: As if her desire for him only grew.
Analysis: Uses appetite metaphor to describe insatiable love.
Device: Metaphor (appetite = desire).
Themes: Desire, passion, irony.

By what it fed on. And yet, within a month

Explanation: Her love increased by what it consumed. And yet, within a month…
Analysis: Shock at her reversal — from insatiable love to quick remarriage.
Themes: Instability of human desire; betrayal.

(Let me not think on ’t; frailty, thy name is woman!),

Explanation: Don’t let me think on it — women are frail!
Analysis: Famous line — Hamlet generalizes Gertrude’s weakness to all women. Misogynistic bitterness rooted in grief.
Device: Apostrophe; gnomic statement.
Themes: Gender, frailty, anger at women.

A little month, or ere those shoes were old

Explanation: Barely a month, before her shoes from the funeral were worn out.
Analysis: Image of indecent haste.
Device: Visual imagery of shoes.
Themes: Mourning vs remarriage.

With which she followed my poor father’s body,

Explanation: The same shoes she wore to the funeral.
Analysis: Reminder of how little time had passed between mourning and marriage.
Themes: Grief, hypocrisy.

Like Niobe, all tears—why she, even she

Explanation: Like Niobe, the mythic figure who wept endlessly — she cried so much.
Analysis: Mythological allusion emphasizes Gertrude’s theatrical grief.
Device: Simile; allusion to Niobe.
Themes: Excess vs insincerity in mourning.

(O God, a beast that wants discourse of reason

Explanation: Oh God, even an animal lacking reason…
Analysis: Compares Gertrude unfavorably to beasts.
Device: Contrast of human vs animal.
Themes: Reason, nature, betrayal.

Would have mourned longer!), married with my uncle,

Explanation: …would have mourned longer than she did, marrying my uncle.
Analysis: Suggests her mourning was shallow.
Themes: Haste, betrayal, incest.

My father’s brother, but no more like my father

Explanation: My uncle — nothing like my father.
Analysis: Direct contrast; Claudius’s inferiority underscored.
Themes: Usurpation, succession.

Than I to Hercules. Within a month,

Explanation: As unlike my father as I am to Hercules.
Analysis: Self-deprecation — Hamlet diminishes himself too.
Device: Classical allusion (Hercules).
Themes: Weakness, inadequacy.

Ere yet the salt of most unrighteous tears

Explanation: Before the salty tears of her false mourning…
Analysis: “Unrighteous” = insincere. He sees her grief as fake.
Device: Metaphor of salt tears.
Themes: False appearances.

Had left the flushing in her gallèd eyes,

Explanation: Before the tears dried from her sore eyes.
Analysis: Suggests indecent haste — eyes still swollen from weeping.
Themes: Insincerity of mourning.

She married. O, most wicked speed, to post

Explanation: She remarried. Oh, wicked haste! To rush…
Analysis: Hamlet’s disgust at her rapidity.
Device: Exclamation; repetition of speed imagery.
Themes: Haste, immorality.

With such dexterity to incestuous sheets!

Explanation: …to leap so skillfully into incestuous marriage bed.
Analysis: “Dexterity” is bitterly ironic — her speed is framed as skill.
Device: Oxymoron (dexterity for sin).
Themes: Incest, corruption.

It is not, nor it cannot come to good.

Explanation: Nothing good can come of this.
Analysis: Hamlet prophesies disaster from this marriage.
Device: Repetition; emphatic tone.
Themes: Doom, corruption.

But break, my heart, for I must hold my tongue.

Explanation: My heart will break, but I must stay silent.
Analysis: His first explicit recognition of inner conflict: speech repressed by circumstance.
Device: Juxtaposition heart/tongue; metaphor of breaking.
Themes: Repression, silence vs expression, grief.

HORATIO

Hail to your Lordship.

Explanation: Horatio formally greets Hamlet with respect.
Analysis: Horatio’s greeting establishes him as a loyal and courteous friend, highlighting the social hierarchy (Hamlet as prince, Horatio as scholar and friend).
Language devices: Salutation, formal diction (“Hail” = respectful greeting).
Themes: Friendship, respect, social hierarchy.

HAMLET

I am glad to see you well.

Explanation: Hamlet expresses pleasure at Horatio’s good health.
Analysis: Shows Hamlet’s politeness and warmth toward his friends; contrasts with his inner melancholy.
Language devices: Simple declarative sentence; understatement, humanizes Hamlet.
Themes: Friendship, human connection, normality amidst grief.

HAMLET

Horatio—or I do forget myself!

Explanation: Hamlet suddenly remembers to address Horatio by name, admitting momentary forgetfulness.
Analysis: Shows Hamlet’s genuine affection and slight awkwardness — he’s overwhelmed by emotion or thought.
Language devices: Self-interruption, exclamation for emphasis, reflective tone.
Themes: Friendship, sincerity, mindfulness of social interaction.

HORATIO

The same, my lord, and your poor servant ever.

Explanation: Horatio replies that he is well and humbly at Hamlet’s service.
Analysis: Demonstrates loyalty and humility. “Poor servant” is a common term of devotion in Elizabethan language.
Language devices: Formality, humility, parallel structure.
Themes: Loyalty, friendship, social formality.

HAMLET

Sir, my good friend. I’ll change that name with you.

Explanation: Hamlet rejects the formal “servant” and wants to address Horatio as a friend.
Analysis: Hamlet values personal loyalty over formal hierarchy; signals intimacy.
Language devices: Contrast between “servant” and “friend,” showing social vs personal bond.
Themes: Friendship, equality, sincerity, human connection.

HAMLET

And what make you from Wittenberg, Horatio?—Marcellus?

Explanation: Hamlet asks why Horatio (and Marcellus) have come from Wittenberg.
Analysis: Shows curiosity and concern for his friends’ travels; transition from pleasantries to serious discussion.
Language devices: Interrogative, parenthetical address (“Horatio?—Marcellus?”) emphasizes informal concern.
Themes: Friendship, inquiry, beginning of plot exposition.

MARCELLUS

My good lord.

Explanation: Marcellus acknowledges Hamlet politely.
Analysis: Brief, deferential reply that reinforces social hierarchy — Marcellus respects Hamlet as prince.
Language devices: Formal address, concise.
Themes: Loyalty, duty, hierarchy.

HAMLET

I am very glad to see you. To Barnardo. Good even, sir.—But what, in faith, make you from Wittenberg?

Explanation: Hamlet warmly greets Barnardo and asks again why they are visiting.
Analysis: Hamlet balances courtesy with genuine curiosity. The repetition of “make you from Wittenberg?” emphasizes the importance of their news.
Language devices: Repetition for emphasis, polite greeting, enjambment between lines mirrors conversational tone.
Themes: Friendship, loyalty, intrigue, curiosity.

HORATIO

A truant disposition, good my lord.

Explanation: Horatio explains his trip as being due to “truant disposition” — jokingly suggesting idleness or skipping duties.
Analysis: Shows modesty, humor, and a desire not to boast. It also reflects his scholar nature (playful understatement).
Language devices: Euphemism, irony (“truant disposition” = playful excuse).
Themes: Friendship, humility, self-deprecation.

HAMLET

I would not hear your enemy say so, Nor shall you do my ear that violence To make it truster of your own report Against yourself. I know you are no truant.

Explanation: Hamlet insists that Horatio is not idle and should not diminish his own character.
Analysis: Hamlet defends Horatio’s honor, highlighting his integrity and mutual respect. Hamlet’s rapid, complex sentence mirrors his intelligence and urgency.
Language devices: Double negatives, rhetorical assertion, hyperbaton (inverted syntax for emphasis).
Themes: Loyalty, honor, friendship, trust.

HAMLET

But what is your affair in Elsinore?

Explanation: Hamlet directly asks the purpose of their visit.
Analysis: Marks shift from social greeting to business — anticipation of the Ghost story.
Language devices: Direct interrogative; tone of concern and authority.
Themes: Mystery, intrigue, curiosity.

HAMLET

We’ll teach you to drink deep ere you depart.

Explanation: Hamlet jokes he will make them drink deeply before leaving.
Analysis: Lightens tone; introduces humor and camaraderie, showing Hamlet’s humanity amidst darker events.
Language devices: Metaphor for hospitality, hyperbole, informal tone.
Themes: Friendship, hospitality, levity before suspense.

HORATIO

My lord, I came to see your father’s funeral.

Explanation: Horatio explains that he attended the funeral of Hamlet’s father.
Analysis: Horatio establishes the somber context and the recent trauma in Hamlet’s life. Shows his role as a loyal friend.
Language devices: Formal address (“my lord”), plain diction emphasizes honesty and respect.
Themes: Death, mourning, friendship.

HAMLET

I prithee, do not mock me, fellow student.

Explanation: Hamlet rebukes Horatio, fearing he is teasing him.
Analysis: Hamlet’s grief makes him sensitive and suspicious; shows his emotional volatility.
Language devices: “Prithee” = please; direct address, emotional tone.
Themes: Grief, distrust, emotional intensity.

HAMLET

I think it was to see my mother’s wedding.

Explanation: Hamlet sarcastically suggests Horatio only came to witness the queen’s hasty marriage.
Analysis: Highlights Hamlet’s anger and disillusionment over his mother marrying Claudius quickly after his father’s death.
Language devices: Irony, sarcasm, enjambment (line flowing into next for dramatic effect).
Themes: Betrayal, grief, family conflict.

HORATIO

Indeed, my lord, it followed hard upon.

Explanation: Horatio confirms that the wedding occurred soon after the funeral.
Analysis: Confirms Hamlet’s perception and deepens the sense of scandal and injustice Hamlet feels.
Language devices: Formal, understated diction.
Themes: Hasty remarriage, social expectations, duty versus emotion.

HAMLET

Thrift, thrift, Horatio. The funeral baked meats Did coldly furnish forth the marriage tables.

Explanation: Hamlet criticizes the quick transition from funeral to wedding, suggesting the funeral food was reused for the wedding feast.
Analysis: Darkly humorous, this line criticizes the moral and social haste of the marriage. Shows Hamlet’s bitter wit.
Language devices: Metaphor (“coldly furnish”), irony, wordplay (“thrift” = frugality).
Themes: Corruption, moral decay, disillusionment.

HAMLET

Would I had met my dearest foe in heaven Or ever I had seen that day, Horatio!

Explanation: Hamlet wishes he had died rather than witness the marriage.
Analysis: Expresses extreme grief and outrage, comparing the wedding to a personal tragedy.
Language devices: Hyperbole, apostrophe (directly addressing Horatio), exclamation.
Themes: Mourning, despair, betrayal, emotional intensity.

HAMLET

My father—methinks I see my father.

Explanation: Hamlet expresses that he envisions his father in his mind.
Analysis: Transition from anger at his mother to deep personal grief and memory. Introduces mental imagery motif.
Language devices: “Methinks” = it seems to me; visual imagery.
Themes: Memory, mourning, vision versus reality.

HORATIO

Where, my lord?

Explanation: Horatio asks Hamlet to clarify where he sees his father.
Analysis: Polite curiosity; shows Horatio’s concern.
Language devices: Simple interrogative.
Themes: Friendship, attentive listening.

HAMLET

In my mind’s eye, Horatio.

Explanation: Hamlet clarifies he sees his father in his imagination, not physically.
Analysis: “Mind’s eye” becomes a key motif for imagination, memory, and perception throughout the play.
Language devices: Metaphor, figurative language.
Themes: Memory, imagination, grief, internal vision.

HORATIO

I saw him once. He was a goodly king.

Explanation: Horatio recalls seeing Hamlet’s father and praises him.
Analysis: Reinforces the high regard for King Hamlet and sets up Hamlet’s idealized memory of his father.
Language devices: Simple praise, elevated diction (“goodly”).
Themes: Respect, memory, paternal idealization.

HAMLET

He was a man. Take him for all in all, I shall not look upon his like again.

Explanation: Hamlet laments that his father was unmatched in character and virtue.
Analysis: Shows Hamlet’s grief and idealization; sets the stage for his disappointment in Claudius.
Language devices: Superlative expression, emphatic repetition (“He was a man”), hyperbole.
Themes: Loss, grief, hero worship.

HORATIO

My lord, I think I saw him yesternight.

Explanation: Horatio reveals he has seen the Ghost of Hamlet’s father.
Analysis: Builds suspense and introduces the supernatural element central to the plot.
Language devices: Suspense, understatement (“I think”), simple declarative.
Themes: Ghosts, mystery, the supernatural, fate.

HAMLET

Saw who?

Explanation: Hamlet expresses surprise and seeks clarification.
Analysis: Demonstrates curiosity, disbelief, and engagement with the mysterious.
Language devices: Short, abrupt interrogative — heightens tension.
Themes: Suspense, uncertainty, supernatural.

HORATIO

My lord, the King your father.

Explanation: Horatio confirms it is King Hamlet’s Ghost.
Analysis: Directly introduces the central supernatural figure, raising stakes.
Language devices: Emphatic, declarative, dramatic revelation.
Themes: Supernatural, fate, legacy.

HAMLET

The King my father?

Explanation: Hamlet repeats in disbelief, showing astonishment and rising emotion.
Analysis: Emphasizes Hamlet’s shock and disbelief; builds suspense for the audience.
Language devices: Repetition, rhetorical question.
Themes: Disbelief, suspense, grief, supernatural.

HORATIO

Season your admiration for a while With an attent ear, till I may deliver Upon the witness of these gentlemen This marvel to you.

Explanation: Horatio asks Hamlet to listen carefully while he recounts the event witnessed by Marcellus and Barnardo.
Analysis: Builds anticipation and suspense; shows Horatio’s careful, rational approach to extraordinary events.
Language devices: Elevated diction (“marvel,” “attent ear”), formal syntax.
Themes: Storytelling, evidence, witness, suspense.

HAMLET

For God’s love, let me hear!

Explanation: Hamlet implores Horatio to tell him immediately.
Analysis: Shows Hamlet’s eagerness and emotional intensity; conveys urgency.
Language devices: Exclamatory, direct appeal.
Themes: Curiosity, suspense, emotion.

HORATIO

Two nights together had these gentlemen, Marcellus and Barnardo, on their watch, In the dead waste and middle of the night, Been thus encountered: a figure like your father, Armed at point exactly, cap-à-pie, Appears before them and with solemn march Goes slow and stately by them. Thrice he walked By their oppressed and fear-surprisèd eyes Within his truncheon’s length, whilst they, distilled Almost to jelly with the act of fear, Stand dumb and speak not to him. This to me In dreadful secrecy impart they did, And I with them the third night kept the watch, Where, as they had delivered, both in time, Form of the thing (each word made true and good), The apparition comes. I knew your father; These hands are not more like.

Explanation: Horatio recounts in detail how Marcellus and Barnardo have seen the Ghost, describing its appearance, armor, solemn march, and their fear. On the third night, Horatio himself sees the Ghost.
Analysis: This long speech creates suspense, vivid imagery, and tension. Horatio is rational and detailed, providing credibility to the supernatural event. Hamlet learns that the Ghost is real and confirms it is his father.
Language devices:
- Imagery: “cap-à-pie” (head to toe), “distilled almost to jelly” conveys fear.
- Alliteration: “fear-surprisèd eyes” emphasizes intensity.
- Suspense & pacing: Gradual build-up over several lines heightens tension.
- Formal diction & narrative: Reflects Horatio’s role as rational witness.
Themes: Supernatural, loyalty, truth versus perception, fate, suspense, grief.

HAMLET

But where was this?

Explanation: Hamlet asks for the exact location where the Ghost appeared.
Analysis: Shows his curiosity and desire to see the Ghost himself. Hamlet’s attention to detail highlights his rational approach amidst emotional turmoil.
Language devices: Simple interrogative; immediacy conveys urgency.
Themes: Curiosity, supernatural, investigation.

MARCELLUS

My lord, upon the platform where we watch.

Explanation: Marcellus answers that the Ghost appeared on the castle’s watchtower.
Analysis: Provides the physical setting, anchoring the supernatural event in reality.
Language devices: Direct, factual language.
Themes: Reality versus supernatural, location as a witness to fear.

HAMLET

Did you not speak to it?

Explanation: Hamlet asks whether the Ghost was addressed by anyone.
Analysis: Hamlet is already anticipating interaction, showing bravery and intellectual curiosity.
Language devices: Direct question, short phrasing conveys eagerness.
Themes: Courage, inquiry, confrontation with the unknown.

HORATIO

My lord, I did, But answer made it none. Yet once methought It lifted up its head and did address Itself to motion, like as it would speak; But even then the morning cock crew loud, And at the sound it shrunk in haste away And vanished from our sight.

Explanation: Horatio recounts trying to speak to the Ghost; it made a gesture but did not answer, vanishing when the rooster crowed.
Analysis: Demonstrates the Ghost’s mysterious and supernatural nature. The rooster crowing symbolizes the break of night and the retreat of spirits.
Language devices: Imagery (“lifted up its head”), simile (“like as it would speak”), personification (Ghost acts with intention), enjambment for suspense.
Themes: Supernatural, fear, timing and fate, communication between worlds.

HAMLET

’Tis very strange.

Explanation: Hamlet comments on the oddity of the event.
Analysis: Shows Hamlet’s acknowledgment of the supernatural reality and foreshadows his later actions.
Language devices: Brief, understated phrase emphasizes curiosity and concern.
Themes: Mystery, supernatural, human response to unexplained phenomena.

HORATIO

As I do live, my honored lord, ’tis true. And we did think it writ down in our duty To let you know of it.

Explanation: Horatio confirms the truth of the sighting and explains that informing Hamlet is their responsibility.
Analysis: Horatio is rational, honest, and loyal; establishes credibility for the Ghost’s reality.
Language devices: Formal address (“my honored lord”), legalistic diction (“writ down in our duty”).
Themes: Duty, loyalty, truth, friendship.

HAMLET

Indeed, sirs, but this troubles me. Hold you the watch tonight?

Explanation: Hamlet admits that the sighting unsettles him and asks if they will be on guard that night.
Analysis: Hamlet begins planning to confront or observe the Ghost himself. Shows his proactive nature.
Language devices: Direct address (“sirs”), interrogation, mild exclamation of emotion.
Themes: Planning, confrontation, anticipation.

ALL

We do, my lord.

Explanation: The men confirm they are keeping watch.
Analysis: Shows their readiness and loyalty.
Language devices: Simple affirmation.
Themes: Duty, readiness.

HAMLET

Armed, say you?

Explanation: Hamlet asks if they are carrying weapons.
Analysis: Shows he is considering the possibility of danger, even from a supernatural source.
Language devices: Short interrogative, suspenseful.
Themes: Fear, preparation, confrontation.

ALL

Armed, my lord.

Explanation: They confirm they are armed.
Analysis: Reinforces realism of the Ghost encounter and the gravity of the situation.
Language devices: Concise, factual response.
Themes: Duty, defense, preparedness.

HAMLET

From top to toe?

Explanation: Hamlet clarifies whether the Ghost was fully armored.
Analysis: Hamlet’s careful observation shows curiosity and analytical thinking.
Language devices: Hyperbolic phrasing emphasizes completeness of armor.
Themes: Detail, observation, fear.

ALL

My lord, from head to foot.

Explanation: The men confirm the Ghost was fully armored.
Analysis: Enhances the Ghost’s imposing and formidable presence.
Language devices: Emphasis through repetition and parallelism.
Themes: Supernatural appearance, fear, authority of the dead.

HAMLET

Then saw you not his face?

Explanation: Hamlet asks if they saw the Ghost’s face.
Analysis: Shows Hamlet’s desire for detailed knowledge; faces symbolize identity and truth.
Language devices: Short, suspenseful question.
Themes: Identity, truth, curiosity.

HORATIO

O, yes, my lord, he wore his beaver up.

Explanation: Horatio says the Ghost had its helmet visor raised, revealing its face.
Analysis: Confirms the Ghost’s identity as King Hamlet.
Language devices: Specific imagery (“beaver up”), formal address.
Themes: Recognition, identity, supernatural.

HAMLET

What, looked he frowningly?

Explanation: Hamlet asks if the Ghost appeared angry.
Analysis: Hamlet reads the Ghost’s expression as potential communication of warning or distress.
Language devices: Interrogative, emotive tone.
Themes: Fear, reading signs, human reaction to the unknown.

HORATIO

A countenance more in sorrow than in anger.

Explanation: Horatio describes the Ghost as sorrowful, not angry.
Analysis: Indicates the Ghost’s purpose is likely to warn or grieve, not threaten.
Language devices: Contrast (“sorrow” vs “anger”), elevated diction.
Themes: Mourning, warning, emotional depth.

HAMLET

Pale or red?

Explanation: Hamlet inquires about the Ghost’s complexion.
Analysis: Hamlet is deeply concerned about the Ghost’s state, reading it for clues.
Language devices: Simple question, vivid imagery.
Themes: Observation, curiosity, supernatural detail.

HORATIO

Nay, very pale.

Explanation: Horatio confirms the Ghost was very pale.
Analysis: Pale complexion suggests death, warning, and sorrow.
Language devices: Concise, descriptive imagery.
Themes: Death, supernatural, foreshadowing.

HAMLET

And fixed his eyes upon you?

Explanation: Hamlet asks if the Ghost stared at them.
Analysis: Suggests the Ghost wants attention or has a specific message.
Language devices: Direct, suspenseful questioning.
Themes: Attention, communication, supernatural.

HORATIO

Most constantly.

Explanation: Horatio confirms the Ghost stared steadily.
Analysis: Suggests purpose, seriousness, and an intentional message.
Language devices: Emphatic phrasing.
Themes: Purpose, warning, supernatural communication.

HAMLET

I would I had been there.

Explanation: Hamlet expresses regret at missing the Ghost.
Analysis: Builds suspense; Hamlet’s eagerness foreshadows his own encounter.
Language devices: Wishful phrasing, exclamatory.
Themes: Curiosity, anticipation, grief.

HORATIO

It would have much amazed you.

Explanation: Horatio predicts the Ghost’s appearance would have shocked Hamlet.
Analysis: Emphasizes the Ghost’s awe-inspiring and unsettling nature.
Language devices: Elevated diction (“amazed”), formal tone.
Themes: Awe, fear, supernatural impact.

HAMLET

Very like. Stayed it long?

Explanation: Hamlet asks if the Ghost lingered for a long time.
Analysis: Shows Hamlet’s focus on timing, foreshadowing the Ghost’s reappearance.
Language devices: Concise, questioning tone.
Themes: Suspense, curiosity, supernatural timing.

HORATIO

While one with moderate haste might tell a hundred.

Explanation: Horatio gives an approximate duration of the Ghost’s appearance.
Analysis: Provides realism and detail, increasing credibility of the encounter.
Language devices: Hyperbole, figurative measurement.
Themes: Observation, measurement, reality of the supernatural.

BARNARDO/MARCELLUS

Longer, longer.

Explanation: They suggest it lasted longer than Horatio observed.
Analysis: Emphasizes the extended, eerie presence of the Ghost.
Language devices: Repetition, parallel phrasing.
Themes: Suspense, supernatural duration, fear.

HORATIO

Not when I saw ’t.

Explanation: Horatio clarifies he only observed for the time mentioned.
Analysis: Adds reliability and measured reporting.
Language devices: Concise, factual.
Themes: Duty, observation, truth.

HAMLET

His beard was grizzled, no?

Explanation: Hamlet asks about the Ghost’s beard.
Analysis: Hamlet focuses on small details to confirm identity.
Language devices: Interrogative, vivid imagery.
Themes: Recognition, identity, memory.

HORATIO

It was as I have seen it in his life, A sable silvered.

Explanation: Horatio confirms the Ghost’s beard is dark with streaks of gray, just as in life.
Analysis: Reinforces authenticity and realism of the apparition.
Language devices: Visual imagery (“sable silvered”), metaphor for age and experience.
Themes: Memory, identity, supernatural realism.

HAMLET

I will watch tonight. Perchance ’twill walk again.

Explanation: Hamlet declares his intention to keep watch to see the Ghost himself.
Analysis: Shows proactive action, courage, and curiosity. Sets up the pivotal encounter.
Language devices: Future tense, conditional “perchance” adds anticipation.
Themes: Curiosity, courage, supernatural confrontation.

HORATIO

I warrant it will.

Explanation: Horatio assures Hamlet that the Ghost will appear again.
Analysis: Reassures Hamlet, showing loyalty and confirming belief in the supernatural.
Language devices: Idiomatic expression (“I warrant”), informal tone.
Themes: Loyalty, reliability, supernatural certainty.

HAMLET

If it assume my noble father’s person, I’ll speak to it, though hell itself should gape And bid me hold my peace. I pray you all, If you have hitherto concealed this sight, Let it be tenable in your silence still; And whatsomever else shall hap tonight, Give it an understanding but no tongue. I will requite your loves. So fare you well. Upon the platform, ’twixt eleven and twelve, I’ll visit you.

Explanation: Hamlet vows to speak to the Ghost if it appears and asks his friends to keep the sighting secret. He gives them instructions for the upcoming watch.

Analysis: Shows Hamlet’s courage, determination, and strategic thinking. Establishes secrecy, suspense, and loyalty. Foreshadows the meeting with the Ghost.

Language devices:

Elevated diction (“assume my noble father’s person,” “tenable in your silence”)

Hyperbole (“though hell itself should gape”)

Polysyndeton (“If you have…Let it be…Give it…”) builds tension.

Themes: Courage, loyalty, secrecy, suspense, fate, supernatural encounter.

ALL

Our duty to your Honor.

Explanation: The guards and Horatio express their loyalty and commitment to Hamlet.
Analysis: Shows respect, obedience, and the social hierarchy of Elsinore. Sets the stage for Hamlet acting independently once alone.
Language devices: Formal address (“your Honor”), declaration of loyalty.
Themes: Duty, loyalty, social hierarchy.

HAMLET

Your loves, as mine to you. Farewell.

Explanation: Hamlet reciprocates their loyalty and affection and bids them goodbye.
Analysis: Hamlet demonstrates politeness and mutual respect, but also signals that he is about to act alone and take responsibility.
Language devices: Parallel structure (“Your loves, as mine to you”), courteous tone.
Themes: Friendship, loyalty, responsibility.

All but Hamlet exit.

Explanation: Stage direction indicating that Hamlet is now alone.
Analysis: This physical isolation mirrors Hamlet’s psychological state, emphasizing introspection and anticipation of confrontation with the Ghost.
Language devices: Stage direction; visual cue for audience focus.
Themes: Isolation, anticipation, personal responsibility.

HAMLET

My father’s spirit—in arms! All is not well.

Explanation: Hamlet reflects on the Ghost of his father, noting it appears armed, signaling danger or unrest.
Analysis: The phrase “all is not well” establishes foreboding and the central conflict. Hamlet immediately senses that the appearance of the Ghost signals trouble in the state of Denmark.
Language devices: Exclamation, metaphor (“in arms” = armed and ready, symbolizing unresolved issues), short declarative sentence for impact.
Themes: Supernatural, disorder, foreboding, political unrest.

HAMLET

I doubt some foul play. Would the night were come!

Explanation: Hamlet suspects sinister events or wrongdoing, and he eagerly anticipates nightfall so he can confront the Ghost.
Analysis: This line foreshadows the revelation of King Hamlet’s murder. Hamlet’s impatience reflects his deep concern and desire for action.
Language devices: Foreshadowing (“foul play”), wishful expression (“Would the night were come!”), suspense-building.
Themes: Suspicion, justice, anticipation, supernatural guidance.

HAMLET

Till then, sit still, my soul. Foul deeds will rise, Though all the earth o’erwhelm them, to men’s eyes.

Explanation: Hamlet tells himself to remain patient, knowing that wrongdoing cannot remain hidden forever—it will eventually come to light.

Analysis: Demonstrates Hamlet’s moral awareness and philosophical reflection. He acknowledges the inevitability of truth and justice.

Language devices: Personification (“sit still, my soul”), foreshadowing, elevated diction (“o’erwhelm”), antithesis between concealment and revelation.

Themes: Justice, morality, inevitability of truth, patience.

He exits.

Explanation: Stage direction indicating Hamlet leaves, likely to prepare for the night’s watch with the Ghost.

Analysis: Marks the end of the scene and builds suspense for the audience, emphasizing Hamlet’s forthcoming encounter with the supernatural and the unfolding of the plot.

Language devices: Stage direction; visual cue for audience anticipation.

Themes: Suspense, preparation, foreshadowing.

Tags:

Date:

September 23, 2025

Up next:

Before: